nv-l

Re: Upgrading NV & CiscoWorks

1999-10-01 11:05:20
Subject: Re: Upgrading NV & CiscoWorks
From: Edvyn.Lek AT BANKOFAMERICA DOT COM
To: nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 08:05:20 -0700
Let me try to put some perspective on this ... remember what Cisco uses to code
this application, and since it's java based, it's single processor based -
performance problem if BIG network. If you network is small, I mean SMALL. Then
yes, otherwise, NO. Leave cw2k alone on its own server. In addition, there's no
integration between cw2k and NV, and if you must you can write your own code to
"integrate" the two products, but not the pull down menus like cw version4.

Additionally, there's no snap-in like in cw version4, for this you will have to
wait for version 3, due out shortly (within the next few weeks?!).

Furthermore, within cw2k, if you have syslog sent to this server (your cw2k
server), you can write a script to send this syslog as traps to the NetView
event console via a trigger which you define within cw2k.

Please remember ... cw2k is NOT LIKE cw version4!!!!!






Christopher Short <chsmcs AT HOTMAIL DOT COM> on 10/01/99 06:19:52 AM

Please respond to Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView
      <NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU>

To:   NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU
cc:    (bcc: Edvyn Lek)
Subject:  Re: Upgrading NV & CiscoWorks



Michael....

We are using NV and Cisco Works 2000, can the NV client and the Cisco Works
2000 client live on the same box and integrate into the NV product
(pull-down menues, product launching, error message correlation), similiar
to the way they integrate in the server environment.

Any light you can shed would be most appreciated.

Thank You
Christopher Short


>From: MICHAEL_IMHOFF AT HP-DENMARK-OM1.OM.HP DOT COM
>Reply-To: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView
>        <NV-L AT UCSBVM.ucsb DOT edu>
>To: NV-L AT UCSBVM.ucsb DOT edu
>Subject: Re: Upgrading NV & CiscoWorks
>Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 10:25:01 +0200
>
>      CiscoWorks 2000 is available for NetView 5.1.x as AIX Maintenance
>      Release #2 (RME 2.2 & CWSI 2.4), which you can download at
>http://www.cisco.com/kobayashi/sw-center/netmgmt/cw2000/maintenance.shtml
>
>
>      - Michael.
>
>
>______________________________ Reply Separator
>_________________________________
>Subject: Re: Upgrading NV & CiscoWorks
>Author:  Non-HP-whitern (whitern AT RBOS.CO DOT UK) at HP-Belgium,mimegw3
>Date:    30-09-99 18:18
>
>
>I have to concur with Edvyn, Cisco's Support of AIX is pretty shabby .....
>
>Neil Whitehead (x22808)
>IT Services (Telecoms)
>The Royal Bank of Scotland
>Tel: 0131-523 2808
>Mobile:07803 501793
>e-mail: neil.whitehead AT rbs.co DOT uk
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brad Martin [SMTP:bmartin AT METLIFE DOT COM]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 1999 4:12 PM
> > To:   NV-L AT UCSBVM.ucsb DOT edu
> > Subject:      Upgrading NV & CiscoWorks
> >
> >
> > *** Warning : this message originates from the Internet ****
> >
> > We are upgrading from NetView 5.0 to 5.1.1 for AIX. We are also running
> > CiscoWorks 4.0.  Does anyone know whether, CiscoWorks 4.0 is compatible
> > with
> > 5.1.1 and Y2K compliant?  If not, what about CiscoWorks 2000?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > Brad Martin
> > MetLife
>The Royal Bank of Scotland plc is registered in Scotland No 90312.
>Registered Of
>fice: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB.
>
>The Royal Bank of Scotland plc is regulated by IMRO, SFA and Personal
>Investment
>  Authority.
>
>This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the addressee only.  If
>the m
>essage is received by anyone other than the addressee, please return the
>message
>  to the sender by replying to it and then delete the message from your
>computer.
>
>'Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure. The Royal Bank of Scotland
>plc doe
>s not accept responsibility for changes made to this message after it was
>sent.'

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>