nv-l

Re: nodes discovered without interfaces

1999-04-20 15:58:07
Subject: Re: nodes discovered without interfaces
From: Leslie Clark <lclark AT US.IBM DOT COM>
To: nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 15:58:07 -0400
I've seen a couple of these cases recently, but they always seem to correct
themselves if I delete them. It might help to stop netmon before you delete
them,
to prevent netmon from starting to make them again before you get to the
ovtopofix. Also, take a look in netmon.trace and see if it is reporting any
wierd things. I've started seeing more and more information in there
lately.
Does ovmapcount -a or -b give anything interesting? .


Cordially,

Leslie A. Clark
IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
(248) 552-4968 Voicemail, Fax, Pager


---------------------- Forwarded by Leslie Clark/Southfield/IBM on 04/20/99
03:53 PM ---------------------------


Schiffinger Ralph 2100 <Ralph.Schiffinger AT ERSTEBANK DOT AT> on 04/15/99
04:40:00 AM

Please respond to Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on
      NetView <NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU>

To:   NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU
cc:    (bcc: Leslie Clark/Southfield/IBM)
Subject:  nodes discovered without interfaces





Nothing to really worry about (so far) but still annoying:
Currently i've got 3 nodes (1 NT-Server, 2 sun's)
showing  up WITHOUT ANY interface.
ovobjprint tells me: 19 IP Status Unknown(1) 104 TopM Interface Count 0
ovtopodump tells me: STATUS: Unknown NUMBER OF INTERFACES:0
Besides, these nodes show up in collections only,
they DO NOT exist on any map.
"Dozens" of delete-from-all-maps and ovtopofix's did not help,
these three nodes are just re-discovered without interfaces...
Discovery of "lots of other stuff" in the same networks is perfectly OK.
So what could be special/wrong with just those three?
Running AIX4.2 NV5.1 Framework3.6
Any ideas?
Regards, Ralph.
iT-AUSTRIA / OE2100 / TK-NET
Tel  (mobil)  0664 1908469
Tel  (iT-A)    21717 58948
FAX (iT-A)    21717 58979
Mailto:Ralph.Schiffinger AT erstebank DOT at

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>