Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 78, Issue 7
2012-10-17 14:29:47
joseph_cheney AT symantec DOT com said:
> Correct -- the cumulative incremental uses the 'full' effectively as an
> exclude list for your backup; a diff inc would use the full + any intervening
> incrementals as an exclude list. The point being it's only required at the
> time of backup.
>
> What it does mean is that, if your original full expires, you can only
> restore the files captured by the still active incremental.
> . . .
One other thing can get thrown into the mix. If the incremental backup is of
the TIR variety (one that tracks deletions & renames), there is an additional
"tir_info" file that gets stored on the backup client (well, for Unix-based
clients anyway -- dunno about Windows).
Those tir_info files are kept around by default for 10 days, but once
they are gone, incrementals start acting like full backups. You'll get
a warning message in the backup logs when this happens, though.
Regards,
Marion
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 78, Issue 7, JC Cheney |
Next by Date: |
Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 78, Issue 8, Steve Quan |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 78, Issue 7, JC Cheney |
Next by Thread: |
Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 78, Issue 8, Steve Quan |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|