Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 78, Issue 7

2012-10-17 14:29:47
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 78, Issue 7
From: Marion Hakanson <hakansom AT ohsu DOT edu>
To: JC Cheney <joseph_cheney AT symantec DOT com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 11:29:40 -0700
joseph_cheney AT symantec DOT com said:
> Correct -- the cumulative incremental uses the 'full' effectively as an
> exclude list for your backup; a diff inc would use the full + any intervening
> incrementals as an exclude list. The point being it's only required at the
> time of backup.
> 
> What it does mean is that, if your original full expires, you can only
> restore the files captured by the still active incremental.  
> . . .

One other thing can get thrown into the mix.  If the incremental backup is of
the TIR variety (one that tracks deletions & renames), there is an additional
"tir_info" file that gets stored on the backup client (well, for Unix-based
clients anyway -- dunno about Windows).

Those tir_info files are kept around by default for 10 days, but once
they are gone, incrementals start acting like full backups.  You'll get
a warning message in the backup logs when this happens, though.

Regards,

Marion


_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>