Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 73, Issue 18

2012-05-25 15:28:50
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 73, Issue 18
From: "Jimenez, Daniel" <Daniel.Jimenez AT owb DOT com>
To: "veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu" <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 12:28:38 -0700
When it comes to overlapping schedules, set both schedules to run at the same 
time and the schedule with the longest retention will be the only one that 
runs. You can create a test policy and test this for yourself. So the yearly 
schedule should have a longer retention, than the monthly or weekly so the 
others will not run. Hope this helps.  

Daniel Jimenez
Backup and Recovery

-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu 
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of 
veritas-bu-request AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 10:00 AM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 73, Issue 18

Send Veritas-bu mailing list submissions to
        veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        veritas-bu-request AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu

You can reach the person managing the list at
        veritas-bu-owner AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Veritas-bu digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Need Information on Limiting the bandwidth via SLP
      (Nic Solomons)
   2. Re: Alert! Backups might not be triggering!!!! - try nbpemreq
      -predict_all (David McMullin)
   3.  Alert! Backups might not be triggering!!!! (reddi72)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 16:35:42 +0100
From: Nic Solomons <Nic.Solomons AT attenda DOT net>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Need Information on Limiting the bandwidth
        via SLP
To: "veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu"
        <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Message-ID: <2D928BA044E170469B7B64CF997B244205152DEBE1@att10exc01abs>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=content&id=HOWTO70618


Cheers,
Nic

From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu 
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Hemant 
Gambhir
Sent: 25 May 2012 15:58
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Need Information on Limiting the bandwidth via SLP

Hi,

I need one information on the SLP but befre that let me explain my setup.

I've one Master server and under that there are 6 Media Servers. - Total 7 
servers

Server Names: Server 1 to Server 6 (All Media Servers)

Server 1 Media server is taking backup of all the clients in the dedupe pool 
and I've configured SLP and duplication jobs are running on Server 2 & it is 
happening over WAN to the dedupe pool which is configured on all the media 
servers.

I want to limit my bandwidth which is used at the time of duplication.

For e.g. I've 100Mbps of link I want to limit the duplication jobs to use only 
30 Mbps and at any cost duplication jobs should not exceed this limit.

Can anyone please assist me on the same.

If the scenario is not very clear please let me know what further information 
is required.
Regards
Hemant Gambhir




The information contained in this e-mail and its attachments is confidential.
It is intended only for the named address(es) and may not be disclosed to 
anyone else without Attenda's consent.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20120525/dfd5c30b/attachment-0001.htm
 

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 11:39:54 -0400
From: David McMullin <David.McMullin AT CBC-Companies DOT com>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Alert! Backups might not be triggering!!!! -
        try nbpemreq -predict_all
To: "veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu"
        <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Message-ID:
        <C83D277D82594A4C8A269B151C83B89A013A6DB16A3C AT CBCMAIL07 DOT 
cbc.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

If you have backup schedules stepping on each other, you might try this...
I run the nbpemreq -predict_all command at midnight and have my operations 
staff check off the backups as they run. Now you have a paper trail for audits 
as well...

Run from cron at 00:00, use command nbpemreq -predict_all -date `date +%d/%m/%Y`


Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 20:28:10 +0530
From: nbuser <nbuser AT live DOT com>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Alert! Backups might not be triggering!!!!
To: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP115864AAF658189D498A219BE010 AT phx DOT gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I am giving a scenario where monthly and yearly backups run on every First
Sunday of the month. What you can do is write a script which will run every
monday morning and which will check backups for that particular client
which ran in last 24 hours. If it doesn't find the yearly schedule it will
send a mail to the user with the warning.

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 7:11 PM, reddi72 <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT 
com>wrote:

> Thanks for all the responses!!! Currently , i am not looking at how to get
> around this ,But, How to catch such situations proactively and  get alerted
> ?
>
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------
> |This was sent by smithareddy36 AT hotmail DOT com via Backup Central.
> |Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------
>


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 09:26:04 -0700
From: reddi72 <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Subject: [Veritas-bu]  Alert! Backups might not be triggering!!!!
To: VERITAS-BU AT MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN DOT EDU
Message-ID: <1337963164.m2f.373169 AT www.backupcentral DOT com>

Thanks nbuser!!! That sounds like something that might work in my case - Do you 
happen to have a script that i can use ?

+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by smithareddy36 AT hotmail DOT com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


End of Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 73, Issue 18
******************************************


_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 73, Issue 18, Jimenez, Daniel <=