Hello Simon.
I can answer you only to the first question.
Unfortunately the file restore of a single file can take as long as a
full restore, as netbackup has to read the backup to find the file. If the file
is in the beginning of the backup, then it is fast, else….
For the 3ed, you can always create multiple
policies.
stefanos
From:
veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of WEAVER,
Simon (external)
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 5:35 PM
To:
veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] FlashBacup -
Restore Question
Hi,
I am
evaluating FlashBackup-Windows. I am backing up a 1.8TB Volume, with millions of
1kb files and via SAN, its taking 3 days.
During a
quck FB-Windows Test Policy, I got this down to 7 hours. However, 2
questions:-
1) Not
been able to test, but is there a downside to restore times for this type of
volume
2) I
read a Technote, that when restoring FB-Windows, certain files dont get
restored, like Outlook .pst files. Now, I cannot find the Technote, but I
wondered if that was fixed in 7.0.1
3) The
Server has 5 volumes, but it does not look like you can "stream" jobs. Does
anyone have a policy where it contains multiple volumes for a single client. And
can you improve the performance? I could Multiplex I
guess.
Thanks
Regards
Simon