Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone on here own a StorageTek SL500 ?[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-10-05 11:40:54
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone on here own a StorageTek SL500 ?[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
From: "Rockey Reed" <rockey_reed AT symantec DOT com>
To: <simon.weaver AT astrium.eads DOT net>, <jpiszcz AT lucidpixels DOT com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 08:40:14 -0700
Justin

If your data is fairly static you may find the built in deduplication of NBU to 
be a benefit. Contact your Symantec system engineer for more information. The 
time spent on this could save you money and administrative burdens. 

Thanks,
Rockey
Please excuse short reply and spelling or grammar errors.

----- Original Message -----
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu <veritas-bu-bounces AT 
mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz AT lucidpixels DOT com>
Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn 
DOT edu>
Sent: Tue Oct 05 06:15:22 2010
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone on here own a StorageTek SL500 
?[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Justin
I have one, and it seems to be at capacity.
This week is the first time tapes have HAD to be ejected to make way for
new tapes to be loaded!

Not a good situation to be in. Its 6 drives, with 143 slots!

I have tried to check we are MPX enough and putting as much Data to a
single tape as possible, but we are limited in costs. 
If you read the Tech Specs at Management level, they talk about 143 x
LTO4 = 114 TB's uncompressed I would guess.

Well I ran a NBU report for client Backup over a period of one week and
it shows over 44,348GB's for just that week. 

Simon

-----Original Message-----
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpiszcz AT lucidpixels DOT com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 12:45 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: Wilkinson, Alex; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Anyone on here own a StorageTek SL500 ?
[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Erm,

More problems on SL500s than the L700 robots.
I'd be curious to hear the experiences from others.

Justin.

On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Justin Piszcz wrote:

> Hi,
>
> They are alright for small, rack-mounted robots, non-redundant though,

> so if you plan on using them, make sure you get two if your backups 
> are mission-critical.  Seems to have more problems with older L700
robots.
> Have experience with expansion modules as well, no issues there.
>
> The SL500 must be mounted perfectly level, if its off by as much as 
> 1mm there will/can be mount errors or it can cause the hand to lockup
or get stuck.
>
> Justin.
>
> On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, WEAVER, Simon (external) wrote:
>
>> Ok so what do you think of it ?
>> I am looking to expand ours with either Drive Modules or Cartridge 
>> Modules.
>> 
>> Simon
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>> [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of 
>> Justin Piszcz
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 12:27 PM
>> To: Wilkinson, Alex
>> Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone on here own a StorageTek SL500 ?
>> [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Post your questions :)
>> 
>> Justin.
>> 
>> On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
>> 
>>>
>>>    0n Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 09:15:30AM +0100, WEAVER, Simon 
>>> (external)
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>   >As per question. Got some questions on expansion to ask!
>>> 
>>> Yup. Shoot!
>>>
>>>  -Alex
>>> 
>>> IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of
>> Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the 
>> Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are 
>> requested to contact the sender and delete the email.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu 
>>> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu 
>> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>> 
>> This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential 
>> and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from

>> disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the 
>> sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and 
>> do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, 
>> but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium

>> disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus 
>> corrupted, altered or falsified.
>> -o-
>> Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 
>> Registered Office:
>> Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
>> 
>

This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential
and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected
from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any
attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its
content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments
from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this
email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified.
-o-
Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office:
Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>