Ok,
All you are writing
at your email are doable.
Puredisk as a client
deduplication has many limitations. Using puredisk at media level is ok.
For the remote offices
there are three choices, regarding your data and your money.
A) You can use one netbackup 7 media server
with deduplication.
B) You can use a netbackup 7 media server and a puredisk
server (PDDO).
C) You can use backup exec 2010 deduplication
and replicate to netbackup 7. (this is something I haven’t test, just hear
of it )
Netbackup license is
per TB. Puredisk has a 256 MB license. Backup exec has a list price of ~$2700
per backup exec server (yes!!). Choose the cheaper that works for you.
But:
You are going to use
it with VCS. For me this is mandatory, as if you lose one puredisk server
you will lose all puredisk environment. Unfortunately the implementation of VCS with purdisk is not the optimal. This
is something I found the hard way. Also, talking before some days with a Symantec
representative, he was very surprised that I have a clustered puredisk
installation. And I was surprised that he was surprised. To my mind, clustered
puredisk installations are mandatory, as I said.
If you continue with
cluster puredisk, be aware that patch 6.6.0.2 which is solving many bugs, is
not tested with clusters. In fact brakes the cluster’s node relationship.
I do not know if they
fix it now, but install it right after the initial installation and be prepared
to call support.
Apart this problem,
puredisk does what it has to do and with huge success. I recommend it for
your environment, but only for what you described at your email.
And do not let the Symantec
tech to leave, before you get good restore speed……
If anybody wants to
know what limitations puredisk client side dedup has:
A) There is a limit of 50 million files per data
selection. (that is “no of files of the system” x “retention”.
For a server with 3 ,5 milion files you can have 14 retention) This kind
of servers are always static and good for client dedup. But there is this
limit. You can break the data selection, but who wants to take the risk to
do it manually.
B) Does not support clusters…. I do
not know if there is any company that has his exchange in a standalone
system… And there is an exchange agent..
C) It does not restore fast enough without tweaking.
But this is not in the manuals. Even Symantec support does not know about. We
had to open there eyes.
D) If you are a netbackup admin, the puredisk 6.6
GUI is very ugly. And it is better than puredisk 6.5.
E) You cannot export to tape from a replicated
puredisk. This is something I cannot understand.
As netbackup
deduplication is based on puredisk 6.6 binaries, almost all limitations of
puredisk exists at netbackup 7. But you can bypass them easily.
Again, as I said,
puredisk for your environment is a good choice.
Sorry for my English.
I hope that you can understand the mining of what I want to write.
stefanos
From: Chapman, Scott
[mailto:Scott.Chapman AT icbc DOT com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 9:11 PM
To: smpt; VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.x to Puredisk cluster
We would use the Puredisk product similar to how we would use a
DD device, it would backend the Master/media servers as a backup
location. We need the environment to be able to cut some tape from the
backups that were written to the disk backup location. We will also need
the disk backup location to be able to replicate to another similar device at
another location; the important part of that replication is that the NetBackup
master needs to know about both of the copies.
At this point we won’t be using the NetBackup 7 dedup as
it is limited, it only does 37TB I believe?? Whereas the Puredisk or DD
devices can manage much more than that. Down the road, I’m thinking
that I can use the NetBackup 7 media server dedup to write dedup backups at our
two small sites and replicated to the puredisk cluster in our HO. I know
I won’t be able to do this with the DD device without buying two more
small ones…so this is why I’m wondering out Puredisk….
Thanks!
Scott Chapman
Senior Technical Specialist
Storage and Database Administration
ICBC - Victoria
Ph: 250.414.7650 Cell: 250.213.9295
From: smpt [mailto:smpt1 AT peppas DOT gr]
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 2:04 AM
To: Chapman, Scott; VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.x to Puredisk cluster
Clarify how you will
use puredisk and if you will use the standalone puredisk product or netbackup 7
deduplication option.
Then we can
talk….
stefanos
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu]
On Behalf Of Chapman, Scott
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 2:12 AM
To: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.x to Puredisk cluster
I’m
wondering if anyone out there is writing backups though NetBackup 6.5.x Media
server to Puredisk? If so, what is your feedback? I’m wanting
to compare puredisk to a data domain device.
Thanks!
Scott Chapman
Senior
Technical Specialist
Storage
and Database Administration
ICBC
- Victoria
Ph:
250.414.7650 Cell: 250.213.9295
This email and any attachments are intended only for the named
recipient and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any unauthorized
copying, dissemination or other use by a person other than the named recipient
of this communication is prohibited. If you received this in error or are not
named as a recipient, please notify the sender and destroy all copies of this
email immediately.
This email and any attachments are intended only for the named
recipient and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any
unauthorized copying, dissemination or other use by a person other than the
named recipient of this communication is prohibited. If you received this in
error or are not named as a recipient, please notify the sender and destroy all
copies of this email immediately.