Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] MS-Windows Synthetic problem with MSCS

2010-01-21 21:52:42
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] MS-Windows Synthetic problem with MSCS
From: David Stanaway <david AT stanaway DOT net>
To: Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:52:18 -0600
Answering my own question,
This was resolved by turning off multistreaming for this policy. With
multistreaming, a separate stream was spawned for each drive, even if
the drive was filtered out and gave errors with the synthetic.

This problem did not occur when the policy was set to not use
multistreaming. Kudos to NBU support for solving this one.

On 12/17/2009 8:39 PM, David Stanaway wrote:
> Okay,
>
> so I have a problem with backing up MSCS clusters with ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES
> backup selections.
>
> The cluster nodes not holding the volume attempt to backup the volumes
> and fail. This was easy enough to fix with policy specific client
> exclusions, and these exclusions for the clustered volumes get skipped
> correctly when backing up with Full, or Differential-Incremental
> schedules, and images for those volumes don't get created.
>
> The Synthetic Full schedule however errors out with the cluster volumes
> with an exist status 671.
>
> Is there something I am missing? The client exclusions are set up right
> as they work for the other schedule types. Do the synthetics ignore the
> exclusion lists since they are not touching the client system?
>
> In Legato, the ALL backup selection skips volumes that are associated
> with an MSCS cluster. Is there a policy specific way I can do the same
> thing?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>   

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [Veritas-bu] MS-Windows Synthetic problem with MSCS, David Stanaway <=