Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] FINALLY DONE!!! 5.1 -> 6.5.2 Upgrade !

2009-08-16 23:25:27
Subject: [Veritas-bu] FINALLY DONE!!! 5.1 -> 6.5.2 Upgrade !
From: MickS <netbackup-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
To: VERITAS-BU AT MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN DOT EDU
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 22:01:06 -0400
Hi Simon 
I'm planning a similar upgrade and would appreciate any input you have on 
timings. In particular how long did nbpushdata  take ?

Cheers
Mick


WEAVER, Simon \(extern... wrote:
> All 
> Just wanted to share with you my experience of the in place upgrade for NBU 
> 5.1 MP7 to 6.5.2  
> Original Plan: Upgrade Master only, then do SAN Media Servers at a later 
> date.  
> However, due to issues with one Media Server and the nbpushdata command 
> having problems communicating with one Media Server (Even though NBCC worked 
> like a charm!), an issue had arisen that required Symantec Help! 
> In the end, it was easier to do an inplace upgrade for everything (Did not 
> make me popular but its done!) and so far its gone ok-ish! 
> Main problem was 1 Media Server was offline, refused to do restores or 
> backups. Turned out it was only Active for disks. Problem tied down to a 
> corrupt ltid and oprd processes. These got repaired by a manual replacement 
> of the files. No idea why it happened, as the box in question installed and 
> upgraded flawlessly! 
> One major problem I have seen is with my Win2k3 Active/Passive Mail Cluster. 
> Now reading some notes, its clear something has changed in terms of how 6.5 
> handles Virtual Server Names, but if anyone can shed any light on this, it 
> would be appreciated. 
> The 5.1 Topology used to show the NODE1 and NODE2 as physical SSO SAN MEDIA 
> SERVERS. I used the command BPSTUADD to create a Virtual Storage Unit called 
> MAIL. This used to appear in the topology of Activity Monitor. 
> Now, it appears, when I run the backup, the topology shows the Virtual Name 
> MAIL as a Computer Icon. As if it is doing the backups over the LAN. Worse 
> still, the throughput is showing speeds as if it is LAN Based Backups !! 
> Not sure why this has happened, but if anyone has a Mail System in a 2-node 
> cluster and was on 5.1 and now moved to 6.5, I would be interested to hear 
> how yours is working! 
> Thanks !  
> Regards  
> Simon


+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by mick.scott AT rheis.co DOT nz via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>