So this means the NDMP traffic goes over the IP network correct? This is
not what we want to do.....Thanks...


Steve Hudson
Enterprise Storage
Iron Mountain
745 Atlantic Ave
Boston, MA 02111
Phone: (617) 535-2849
 
steve.hudson AT ironmountain DOT com
 
 
Visit the new www.ironmountain.com
        Tour Iron Mountain
-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of tburrell
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 4:18 PM
To: VERITAS-BU AT MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN DOT EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] SSO Option for LTO3 drives


Steve,
OK- I forgot about one of the key elements: the NDMP backups do actually
run through the media servers via Remote NDMP.  They are still using
NDMP, but our solaris/windows media servers handle the tape drives for
them.


Sorry for the misinformation- the devil is in the details.
javascript:emoticon('[Embarassed]')

Tom


Hudson, Steve wrote:
> Tom do you mean you share 6 LTO drives between regular backups and
NDMP
> backups ?? How do you do this?? The manual is not clear and we
currently
> dedicate drives to NDMP only. We would like not to do this.. Any
> information would be appreciated..... Thanks.....We do have SSO
licensed
> 
> 
> 
> Steve Hudson
> Enterprise Storage
> Iron Mountain
> 745 Atlantic Ave
> Boston, MA 02111
> Phone: (617) 535-2849
> 
> steve.hudson < at > ironmountain.com
> 
> 
> Visit the new www.ironmountain.com
> Tour Iron Mountain
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: veritas-bu-bounces < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces < at > mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
tburrell
> Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 2:12 PM
> To: VERITAS-BU < at > MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] SSO Option for LTO3 drives
> 
> 
> I'll chime in here for SSO too- if you have it, then zoning drives to
> only one host is pointless and silly.
> 
> We are using 3 media servers and 2 NetApp appliances attached to 6
LTO3
> drives (soon to be 8 ) on a StorageTek l700 with SSO.  All media
servers
> can use all tape drives  as can the NetApps over NDMP. Running 6.5.3.1
> (Netapps are at DOT 7.3.1) and it works very well.  We have some
> occasional quirks with SSO when drives have issues, but it's more than
> offset by the efficiencies we gain.  
> 
> 
> If you already own SSO- use it.  It has some quirks as others
describe,
> but you'll probably find you get much better utilization out of your
> drives.
> 
> Tom Burrell
> 
> 
> David Turner wrote:
> 
> > I have 1 windows master running Netbackup 6.5 with 3 media servers.
I
> > 
> have Storagetek/Sun SL8500 with 8 LTO3 tape drives (2 drives are
> dedicated via NDMP to a Netapp 3050). All drives are connected via FC
to
> brocade etc. we have the Shared storage option but I don't think it's
> working properly. How can I verify that its working?  
> 
> > 
> > I believe the engineers that configured the zoning on the switch
> > 
> dedicated 2 drives per server and dedicate 2 to the Netapp. Did it
makes
> sense to purchase SSO?  
> 
> > 
> > 
> > I was told you should only have 2 LTO3 drives per servers because of
> > 
> "shoe shining" and the servers ability to handle more than 2 drives
> (Dell 2950's quad cores with 8gig of ram). I am wondering if the
switch
> should be rezoned to make use of SSO or can the zoning have an impact
on
> how SSO should be configured? How can these 2 play together? 
> 
> > 
> > As you can see I am all confused and would love for someone to
explain
> > 
> this in simple terms. 
> 
> > 
> > thanks
> > 
> 
> 
>
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
> |This was sent by tburrell_mn < at > yahoo.com via Backup Central.
> |Forward SPAM to abuse < at > backupcentral.com.
>
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> The information contained in this email message and its attachments
> is intended
> only for the private and confidential use of the recipient(s) named
> above, unless the sender expressly agrees otherwise. Transmission
> of email over the Internet
> is not a secure communications medium. If you are requesting or
> have requested
> the transmittal of personal data, as defined in applicable privacy
> laws by means
> of email or in an attachment to email you must select a more
> secure alternate means of transmittal that supports your
> obligations to protect such personal data. If the reader of this
> message is not the intended recipient and/or you have received this
> email in error, you must take no action based on the information in
> this email and you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> misuse, copying, or disclosure of this communication is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received
> this communication in error, please notify us immediately by email
> and delete the original message.
 [Embarassed] [Embarassed]

+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by tburrell_mn AT yahoo DOT com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu