Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Jumping back into the NBU pool

2009-03-27 10:54:17
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Jumping back into the NBU pool
From: "Mark Glazerman" <Mark.Glazerman AT spartech DOT com>
To: "Jeff Lightner" <jlightner AT water DOT com>, "Schaefer, Harry" <Harry.Schaefer AT turner DOT com>, <VERITAS-BU AT MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:50:07 -0500
Nope... Solaris 10 x86

Mark Glazerman
Desk: 314-889-8282
Cell: 618-520-3401
 please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to


-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Lightner [mailto:jlightner AT water DOT com] 
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 9:50 AM
To: Mark Glazerman; Schaefer, Harry; VERITAS-BU AT MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN DOT EDU
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Jumping back into the NBU pool

By Solaris do you mean OpenSolaris?  These are Intel boxes.

-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu 
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Mark 
Glazerman
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 10:34 AM
To: Schaefer, Harry; VERITAS-BU AT MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Jumping back into the NBU pool

Our NBU master is a HP DL385 G2 and our main media server is an HP DL380 G5, 
both running Solaris 10 and NBU 6.5.1

We used to run our master and media servers on Sun hardware but for the price, 
these HP's absolutely scream.

Mark Glazerman
Desk: 314-889-8282
Cell: 618-520-3401
 please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to

-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu 
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of 
Schaefer, Harry
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 7:43 AM
To: VERITAS-BU AT MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN DOT EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Jumping back into the NBU pool

I have not been a NBU engineer for about 3 years, but may be getting
back into the mix soon with a small but useful setup.

We have about 12 Solaris & 3-4 Win2003 servers we need backed up that
are on an isolated network. They will have pretty slender policies which
will not require a whole lot of index space. Probably something like 1-2
full's a week with incrementals in between and 2-3 week retention. 

Anyway, looking for some suggestions on a master/media spec that could
handle this. Along with that client load, there will probably be SAN
attached disk and a pair of LTO4 tape drives. 

I don't have experience in small environments and I don't want to
overkill it. Any ideas would be welcome. :-)

Harry S.
Atlanta 
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
 
Please consider our environment before printing this e-mail or attachments.
----------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential 
information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are 
not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of 
the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the 
sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
----------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>