Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup speeds with new Ultra320 HBA + LTO3

2009-03-19 11:48:21
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup speeds with new Ultra320 HBA + LTO3
From: Dave Markham <dave.markham AT fjserv DOT net>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz AT lucidpixels DOT com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:25:50 +0000
Dude you're preaching to the converted. I actually spend a good month 
doing a formal document and proposal for server replacement and library 
plus netbackup upgrade and various improvements over the current set up 
such as deduplication etc all to be told "no we are not spending any 
money and backups are not important so we will get a new library only"

I of course then found the hba we had was not compatible with solaris8 
and so had to build Os on 2 other disks and swap em out.

Complete nightmare.

Cheers


Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Dave Markham wrote:
>
>> Reply in line at bottom
>>
>> Justin Piszcz wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Dave Markham wrote:
>>>
>>>> Guys we have installed an Ultra320 HBA into an E220R in slot1 (66mhz)
>>>> and attached dual scsi to an SL24 with 2 half heigh LTO3 drives. 1
>>>> Channel per tape drive.  Single Master/Media combo
>>>>
>>>> This is all on Solaris 9 with Netbackup 5.0mp7.
>>>>
>>>> I wont go into the details but suffice to say the customer won't spend
>>>> any money on backups but of course needs them to work. We only got the
>>>> new SL24 due to the previous L1000 falling over constantly and not 
>>>> being
>>>> able to get support on it easily.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway...
>>>>
>>>> I have installed all this, but am getting quite poor speeds on 
>>>> backups.
>>>>
>>>> doing a ufsdump or tar from base os doesnt get much speed and using
>>>> netbackup gets higher speeds due to :-
>>>>
>>>> /usr/openv/netbackup/db/config/NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS = 16
>>>> /usr/openv/netbackup/db/config/SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS = 262144
>>>>
>>>> We have also added the tuning parameters into /etc/system for shared
>>>> memory etc.
>>>>
>>>> I havn't messed with the st.conf and just let the drive do what it 
>>>> wants
>>>> but was after any tips if that is the next area to focus on.
>>>>
>>>> Currently getting about 8 - 25mb/s on backups depending on amount of
>>>> jobs running.
>>>>
>>>> e.g just doing a local backup of master server direct to the drive 
>>>> gets
>>>> average :-
>>>>
>>>> root@host-SL24# grep Kbytes/sec log.031609
>>>> 15:26:35.390 [16237] <4> write_backup_completion_stats: successfully
>>>> wrote 1 of 1 multiplexed backups, total Kbytes 6175485 at 10395.319
>>>> Kbytes/sec
>>>> root@host-SL24#
>>>>
>>>> I need to check the HBA is running at 320. I can't see any messages 
>>>> from
>>>> dmesg or /var/adm/messages saying its been downgraded to ultra160 
>>>> but it
>>>> may be hidden elsewhere?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>>>> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>>>>
>>>
>>> What speed is your NIC?  Your SIZE data buffers is good but your NUMBER
>>> data buffers should probably be set to at least 32.  The half-height 
>>> drives
>>> may write a little slower but IMO they should be faster than that 
>>> speed.
>>>
>>> Do you have both drives on the same port of the SCSI card?  Only attach
>>> one drive per-port for maximum speed.  What speeds do you get when 
>>> you, e.g.,
>>> FTP from boxA to the master? 100MiB/s?
>>>
>>> Justin.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Nic is actually a fibre Gig nick set at 1000mpbs but the network is 
>> only 100mbps for the rest of the infastructure.
>>
>> The thing is i'm not doing any network tests as yet and expect better 
>> speeds direct attached from the backup server.
>>
>> The HBA has port A connected to Drive 1 and port B connected to Drive 2.
>>
>> Although i can tweak netbackup a bit, i'm just concerned tars and 
>> ufsdumps are getting around 10MBps which seems pretty poor.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>
> An E220R is a pretty ancient server, I would not expect good speeds 
> from it, unless you are using 10K+ RPM drives and a raid 
> configuration, you are probably not going to get great speed.
>
> The last shipment of that type of server was November 2009 and that 
> server was officially released in November 1999.  I would suggest 
> replacing it with a HP DL380/385 etc.
>
> Justin.
>
>

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>