Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Clarity on new tech alert (some NBU 6.5.x

2008-12-02 09:17:57
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Clarity on new tech alert (some NBU 6.5.x
From: mkgunderson AT mmm DOT com
To: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 08:05:57 -0600

As I understand the TechNote, you would only be affected if you had any EEB's of nbpem applied to your 6.5.2x environment, as the original version of nbpem in 6.5.2a is unaffected.

The problem only involves backups using the calendar-based backups.  When a backup window opens and the job queues before midnight, and the job goes active after midnight, the backup would succeed as expected.  The problem is that the next backup may not run as expected due to the bug.  In addition, it does not matter if the backup is a full backup or an incremental backup.

By using versioninfo, you can verify the version of nbpem.  If the version output list anything other than just NetBackup 6.5.2 / 6.5.2A or SET1448343 this issue may be experienced.

Since we have calendar backup policies that do span midnight, as the TechNote states, I have a support call opened, however, I am told that there is no EEB currently available to correct the issue.

Given all the problems with nbpem, I am sure this involves quite a few shops as most probably have some version of nbpem other than the original version.


Mike


----- Message from <judy_hinchcliffe AT administaff DOT com> on Mon, 1 Dec 2008 13:39:10 -0600 -----
To:
<David_Cornely AT intuit DOT com>, <VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Subject:
Re: [Veritas-bu] Clarity on new tech alert (some NBU 6.5.x)


Not a problem for me has I have not applied any of the binaries.
 
 



From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Cornely, David
Sent:
Monday, December 01, 2008 1:16 PM
To:
VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject:
[Veritas-bu] Clarity on new tech alert (some NBU 6.5.x)

 

Anyone else seen this?

http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/311581.htm

The description is a bit ambiguous so I’m trying to get clarity:

“A potential for missed backups without notification has been discovered in NetBackup Server/Enterprise Server when calendar based schedules have a configured window spanning midnight and go Active after midnight. This may result in a client backup not running during the next open window for any calendar based schedules configured in the same policy. This is independent of the scheduled backup type being configured as Full or Incremental.”

Does this refer to jobs going active after midnight or the policy itself being made active after midnight?  I think it’s referring to when queued jobs go active after midnight but wanted to be sure.

TIA,

-Dave



----- Message from Len Boyle <Len.Boyle AT sas DOT com> on Mon, 1 Dec 2008 14:54:34 -0500 -----
To:
"Cornely, David" <David_Cornely AT intuit DOT com>, "VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu" <VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Subject:
Re: [Veritas-bu] Clarity on new tech alert (some NBU 6.5.x)


I believe that it means that the job goes active after midnight. But you have to have 6.5.2 or better with an eng binary or 6.5.3 to have the problem.
 
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Cornely, David
Sent:
Monday, December 01, 2008 2:16 PM
To:
VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject:
[Veritas-bu] Clarity on new tech alert (some NBU 6.5.x)

 

Anyone else seen this?

http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/311581.htm

The description is a bit ambiguous so I’m trying to get clarity:

“A potential for missed backups without notification has been discovered in NetBackup Server/Enterprise Server when calendar based schedules have a configured window spanning midnight and go Active after midnight. This may result in a client backup not running during the next open window for any calendar based schedules configured in the same policy. This is independent of the scheduled backup type being configured as Full or Incremental.”

Does this refer to jobs going active after midnight or the policy itself being made active after midnight?  I think it’s referring to when queued jobs go active after midnight but wanted to be sure.

TIA,

-Dave

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [Veritas-bu] Clarity on new tech alert (some NBU 6.5.x, mkgunderson <=