Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM 6.5.

2008-11-10 17:00:49
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM 6.5.
From: "Andrew White" <adwhite AT inchix DOT net>
To: "Ed Wilts" <ewilts AT ewilts DOT org>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:39:18 +1100
Thanks Ed,

I'm interested if anyone is using it in a large site and if so, it what capabilities, what server configuration and how is it performing for them :)

By large, I mean tens of thousands of jobs and thousands of clients...

Cheers

Andrew

On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Ed Wilts <ewilts AT ewilts DOT org> wrote:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Andrew White <adwhite AT inchix DOT net> wrote:

I'm just wondering what are peoples thoughts on NOM 6.5?  In what capacity are you using NOM (reporting and/or alerting (snmp/email)) and has anyone got it configured in a cluster?

After the Customer Forum in Roseville at the end of October, Erica convinced me to put it up.  Although I generally like NOM, we haven't had much success with it and the we've got an open case where it seems to contribute to tipping over our master server (and yes, it's a separate server).  Right now, we've got NOM turned off.

YMMV, obviously.
    .../Ed

Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewilts AT ewilts DOT org

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>