Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Data Domain vs Quantum DXi

2008-11-07 17:02:57
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Data Domain vs Quantum DXi
From: "Jeff Lightner" <jlightner AT water DOT com>
To: "Mark Glazerman" <Mark.Glazerman AT spartech DOT com>, <VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 16:46:41 -0500
Ouch!   

Funny - it made me lookup up DD's symbol - Their NASDAQ symbol is "DDUP".  
Gotta love that.

-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu 
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Mark 
Glazerman
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 3:41 PM
To: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Data Domain vs Quantum DXi

http://finance.google.com/finance?client=ob&q=NYSE:QTM

I have $1… I’ll take 3 shares and my change please.

Mark Glazerman
Desk: 314-889-8282
Cell: 618-520-3401
 please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to

-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu 
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of oersted
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 2:11 PM
To: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Data Domain vs Quantum DXi


if you can wait a little while , there will be some interesting solutions in 
this arena soon. 


Robin Small wrote:
> Thanks to the folks that commented on EMC's Avamar, it was helpful. 
> 
> I'm curious now about DataDomain & Quantum DXi.  
> 
> We run XioTech SANs and they're bundling a DD960(something) head on to the 
> XioTech SAN. 
> We're also using ADIC (now Quantum) for our Tape hardware. So those two 
> bubbled up to the top. 
> 
> I'm meeting with our Quantum sales & engineer guys on Monday to talk about 
> it, and I was watching a DD/XioTech webinar about their offering that looks 
> cool. Both look appealing. 
> 
> I'm curious for the dedup users out there what your experience has been with 
> either DD or Quantum. 
> 
> I've been poking through Curtis' blogs about the subject, so I get it that 
> the Quantum can do either inline or post, and the DD is pure inline. My RPO 
> isn't as critical (most of my users are happy with the prior night's data), 
> so PostProcessing isn't a game-changer. 
> 
> Thanks, 
> 
> ~ Robin


+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by solaris AT cablespeed DOT com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
----------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential 
information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are 
not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of 
the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the 
sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
----------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu