[Veritas-bu] What are your thoughts on filesystem monitoring?
2008-11-06 16:52:52
In our organization we have a hole in the process between our unix and backup
teams.
We use includes vs. excludes for our misc. filesystem type backups.
The Unix team rarely tells us when they add a new filesystem on a server. At
current we have left it at a "If you don't tell us we don't know about it" but
that is neither proactive nor productive.
One of the members of our backup team that was formerly a member of the storage
team has a script in place that sends him an email whenever a filesystem is
added to a Unix server. His suggestion is that we take the initiative and add
these filesystems to the backups whenever a new one comes in.
My thought is while that is great perhaps its time to move to an "excludes"
type of system, granted its a manual effort across hundreds of Unix servers and
we will probably have to manage the excludes in many the same ways...
Thoughts? Am I making sense?
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by MichaelPishnery AT eaton DOT com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Veritas-bu] What are your thoughts on filesystem monitoring?,
MPish44 <=
|
|
|