Re: [Veritas-bu] Most recent stable release?
2008-08-21 12:05:46
You probably want your Windows media server at 6.5.2A, if you want it at
6.5 anything. (You are, of course, allowed to just leave it at 5.1, but 6.5.2 is
where you start getting features supporting Exchange 2007, like backing up from
an inactive node of a cluster. 6.5.3 will provide individual mailbox item
restore from a database backup, rather than having to do the additional brick
level backup to get that.) In theory that means that you should move your Linux
master and media servers to at least 6.5.2A as well, but that higher version
rule is less explicit, given what was changed in this particular A release. (If
you can take the downtime, go ahead and pull everything up.)
I've personally had no problems with 6.5.2 or 6.5.2A on HP-UX
11iv2 masters, and I believe that the problems related to its misbehavior
on a master server (except for that "first cumulative after upgrade is
actually a full; whoops" thing) that have been reported here pertain only to
Solaris and Windows. I can't speak from experience to Linux master/media
servers.
-- gabriel rosenkoetter Radian Group
Inc, Unix/Linux/VMware Sysadmin / Backup &
Recovery gabriel.rosenkoetter AT radian DOT biz, 215 231 1556
I have some interest in this topic. We are running a fairly simple,
fresh, 6.5.2 install with one RHEL4 Master and one RHEL4 Media server. Things
are going relatively smoothly. But we are looking at moving our first
Windows Media Server over from the old 5.1 world to the new 6.5.2 environment.
This Media Sever looks after backups for an Exchange cluster and Enterprise
Vault for Exchange. 6.5.2 is pretty stable for us in a Linux only
environment. But what do others think about introducing a W2K3 Media
Server into the mix? 6.5.2? 6.5.1? Any thoughts appreciated. Keep in mind
this will only be a Media Server. The Master is still Linux and so far has been
pretty stable (apart from a few problems that can't really be blamed on
Netbackup itself). Thanks, Dean
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Mark Glazerman <Mark.Glazerman AT spartech DOT com>
wrote:
We're running 6.5.1 on
a Solaris x86 master and apart from a ZFS issue (which was fixed with
engineering binaries) we don't have any ongoing problems. 6.5.2
and 6.5.2a seem to be releases that fixe lots of issues for some and
create additional problems for others.
Mark J
Mark
Glazerman
Desk: 314-889-8282
Cell: 618-520-3401
P please don't print this e-mail unless you
really need to
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 6:04 AM, <Bluejay AT fujigreenwood DOT com> wrote:
Watch out for this one with 6.5.1 on Windows:
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/301175.htm
The technote says that this is fixed in 6.5.2.
Right now I'm caught between that one and the completely broken 6.5.2A
- http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/305609.htm
The technote says that there's an EEB available for this. 6.5.2A
is *NOT completely broken. Many years, us included, are running it in
full production.
You'd think they'd test this stuff before release by ,say, trying to run
a backup or something...
This has been discussed before. Your
comment is unwarranted and low shots like this don't encourage Symantec
employees or other users to help you.
.../Ed
Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE ewilts AT ewilts DOT org
_______________________________________________ Veritas-bu
maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Veritas-bu] Most recent stable release?, (continued)
Re: [Veritas-bu] Most recent stable release?, Justin Piszcz
Re: [Veritas-bu] Most recent stable release?, Ed Wilts
Re: [Veritas-bu] Most recent stable release?, Stafford, Geoff
Re: [Veritas-bu] Most recent stable release?, WALLEBROEK Bart
Re: [Veritas-bu] Most recent stable release?,
Rosenkoetter, Gabriel <=
Re: [Veritas-bu] Most recent stable release?, Rosenkoetter, Gabriel
Re: [Veritas-bu] Most recent stable release?, Rosenkoetter, Gabriel
Re: [Veritas-bu] Most recent stable release?, Rosenkoetter, Gabriel
Re: [Veritas-bu] Most recent stable release?, Rosenkoetter, Gabriel
Re: [Veritas-bu] Most recent stable release?, Esson, Paul
|
|
|