Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Best Practice: Location of the NetBackupCatalog

2008-05-14 11:19:03
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Best Practice: Location of the NetBackupCatalog
From: "WEAVER, Simon \(external\)" <simon.weaver AT astrium.eads DOT net>
To: "Larry Fahnoe" <fahnoe AT fahnoetech DOT com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 16:04:42 +0100
Hello Larry
You could colour your beard :-) I cannot believe Ed is that old !
 
Simon


From: Larry Fahnoe [mailto:fahnoe AT fahnoetech DOT com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 3:34 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Best Practice: Location of the NetBackupCatalog

Simon,

I work with Ed.  My beard is gray, Ed doesn't have a beard, but he is older than both of us.  Respect your elders!  ;-}

--Larry

On 5/14/08, WEAVER, Simon (external) <simon.weaver AT astrium.eads DOT net> wrote:

Ed, 34 years old and probably older than yourself young man, but as posted, some of the failures I have seen have been quite interesting to see :-)
 
Thanks for your reply
 
Warm Regards
Simon


From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 10:08 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Best Practice: Location of the NetBackupCatalog

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:13 AM, WEAVER, Simon (external) <simon.weaver AT astrium.eads DOT net> wrote:

Presently, I have NetBackup and the catalog installed locally, on RAID5 set, hot swappable.

If you lose 2 drives in somewhat rapid succession, your catalog is gone.  The 2nd drive typically fails while you're rebuilding the RAIDset after the first one dies due to the high load put on the drives.  If you haven't seen a double-disk failure yet, you're not old enough.  Whether the drives are hot swappable or not doesn't matter.  What matters is whether the RAID rebuild completes before the 2nd drive dies.  The race is on and sometimes the RAID rebuild doesn't complete in time.
 

My question is this: Is there a best practice for the location of the Catalog? For example, SAN attached disk? I sort of feel uncomfortable with this for several reasons:

1) If you lose SAN connectivity (due to a major disaster or failure) the catalog has gone

If you lose SAN connectivity, you lose*access* to the catalog - you don't lose the catalog.

Being stored locally, means the Server and its application (including the catalog) goes with it, and does not rely on an extra layer of hardware for the catalog to be available.

I think my concerns come from a previous environment where the catalog was stored on a SAN,  and was totally destroyed and unrecoverable, which meant a complete import of hundreds of tapes.

The likelihood of a well managed enterprise SAN destroying the data is FAR less likely than a double-disk failure of a RAID-5 set.  FAR, FAR, FAR less.

If anyone has any feedback on this, would like to hear the pro's and con's to storage off the physical server itself. I have always had the catalog locally stored.

My catalog is on the SAN.  It's replicated to another SAN array.  It's also backed up to tape and the recovery information is emailed to my home email address (since my work email is also SAN-based).
 
If you can't trust the reliability of your SAN, get another SAN and/or SAN admin.  And I'm a SAN admin...

   .../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP
mailto:ewilts AT ewilts DOT org

If I've helped you, please make a donation to my favorite charity at http://firstgiving.com/edwilts
This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or
privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it
for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this
message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all
liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or
falsified.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
REGISTERED OFFICE:-
Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu




--
Larry Fahnoe, Fahnoe Technology Consulting, fahnoe AT FahnoeTech DOT com
952/925-0744      Minneapolis, Minnesota       www.FahnoeTech.com
This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or
privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it
for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this
message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all
liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or
falsified.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
REGISTERED OFFICE:-
Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>