Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] master vs. media servers behind firewalls.

2008-04-28 09:13:08
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] master vs. media servers behind firewalls.
From: "Preston, Doug" <dpreston AT landam DOT com>
To: "Michitsch, John" <JMICHITS AT gannett DOT com>, <Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 08:56:06 -0400
Media server and master server license are the same thing in 6.5


Doug Preston

------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission may constitute a communication
that is legally privileged. It is not intended for transmission to, or
receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If you have received this
electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system
without copying it, and notify the sender by reply e-mail, so that our
address record can be corrected.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------


-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of
Michitsch, John
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 4:32 AM
To: Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] master vs. media servers behind firewalls.

This is a question about a Netbackup 6.5 deployment.  We are currently
using separate master servers for our internal clients and our external
clients in both of our primary datacenters.  This equates to four
separate backup environments to manage.  We would like to have one
master for all of our environments.  We are thinking about one master
server in our primary location, a media server in the secondary location
and media servers for the two external environments.  We would open
ports to allow the external media servers to communicate through the
firewall to our internal master server, giving us a single view for all
backups.  

  However, when reading the documentation, Symantec recommends having a
separate master per firewall domain and using NOM to manage all of them.
We do not want to pay for three additional master server licenses and a
NOM license.  Is anyone already doing this, or have any opinions as to
why I would not do it?

 

Thanks.


_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>