Dear All,
Sorry for the dummy question - answer came from reading the Admin Guide :)
I have created NB_duplicates volume pool and moved couple of scratch
tapes there. Now my bpduplicate works fine.
Thank you,
Andrey
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 8:39 AM, Andrey Halezov
<andrey.halezov AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> Justin, Jeff,
> Thank you for your answers.
>
> Indeed I was trying to multiplex backup and duplicate to the same
> tape. Looks like my problem isn't linked to multiplexing - right now
> all my backups are done, tape drive is idle but I am getting the same
> error.
>
> Is NetBackup trying to find tape in a particular volume pool (I wish I
> knew which one :) ) and failing to do so?
>
> Thank you,
> Andrey
>
> root@bh-ap2>
> root@bh-ap2>/netbackup/openv/netbackup/bin/admincmd/bpduplicate
> -dstunit mktdb1_L1000 -backupid sh-int2_1206317428
> Duplicate started Thu Mar 27 09:18:03 2008
> INF - Destination storage unit mktdb1_L1000 on host bh-ap2.
> INF - Duplicating class Unix-servers, schedule
> dailyINCR_SunMonTueWedThuSat_2000_2weeks (sh-int2_1206317428) created
> 03/23/2008 20:10:28, path /mnt_backup_c3t11s6.
> INF - write host bh-ap2: unable to allocate new media for backup,
> storage unit has none available (96)
> INF - Duplicate of backup id sh-int2_1206317428 failed, unable to
> allocate new media for backup, storage unit has none available (96).
>
> INF - Status = no images were successfully processed.
>
> root@bh-ap2>
> root@bh-ap2>
> root@bh-ap2>/usr/openv/netbackup/bin/goodies/available_media
> media media robot robot robot side/ ret size status
> ID type type # slot face level KBytes
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Emergency pool
>
> Free pool
>
> NB_database pool
>
> NT pool
>
> NetBackup pool
>
> DLK072 DLT TLD 0 9 - 1 26275649
> ACTIVE/MPX 04/10/200801:00
> DLK018 DLT TLD 0 27 - - - AVAILABLE
> DLK019 DLT TLD 0 3 - - - AVAILABLE
> DLK088 DLT TLD 0 11 - - - AVAILABLE
> DLK091 DLT TLD 0 4 - - - AVAILABLE
> DLK095 DLT TLD 0 2 - - - AVAILABLE
> DLK096 DLT TLD 0 14 - - - AVAILABLE
> DLK098 DLT TLD 0 17 - - - AVAILABLE
> A00002 DLT TLD 0 16 - - - DBBACKUP
> A00003 DLT TLD 0 1 - - - DBBACKUP
> DLK021 DLT TLD 0 19 - 1 0 FROZEN
> DLK017 DLT TLD 0 21 - 3 22711648 FROZEN
> 11/23/200721:25
> DLK012 DLT TLD 0 5 - 3 4583584 FROZEN
> 11/24/200711:56
> DLK013 DLT TLD 0 15 - 1 36914389
> FULL/MPX 03/27/200820:52
> DLK020 DLT TLD 0 20 - 1 43809333
> FULL/MPX 03/28/200808:09
> DLK028 DLT TLD 0 12 - 2 43765002
> FULL/MPX 03/28/200821:01
> DLK005 DLT TLD 0 25 - 2 38001475
> FULL/MPX 03/28/200822:58
> DLK027 DLT TLD 0 30 - 2 33077938
> FULL/MPX 03/29/200804:24
> DLK071 DLT TLD 0 26 - 2 34081495
> FULL/MPX 03/29/200807:21
> DLK008 DLT TLD 0 6 - 1 42857041
> FULL/MPX 03/30/200822:20
> DLK089 DLT TLD 0 29 - 1 34889526
> FULL/MPX 04/02/200800:32
> DLK093 DLT TLD 0 8 - 1 45840958
> FULL/MPX 04/02/200822:58
> DLK032 DLT TLD 0 18 - 1 51049412
> FULL/MPX 04/04/200820:32
> DLK079 DLT TLD 0 13 - 1 38032150
> FULL/MPX 04/07/200820:02
> DLK078 DLT TLD 0 23 - 1 38429889
> FULL/MPX 04/08/200800:40
> DLK097 DLT TLD 0 7 - 1 46058659
> FULL/MPX 04/08/200820:42
> DLK094 DLT TLD 0 28 - 1 42246199
> FULL/MPX 04/09/200802:06
> DLK080 DLT TLD 0 24 - 1 42336183
> FULL/MPX 04/09/200821:49
>
> None pool
>
> CLN204 DLT_CLN TLD 0 10 - - - AVAILABLE
> CLN207 DLT_CLN TLD 0 22 - - - AVAILABLE
>
> SYBASE pool
>
> UNIX pool
>
> root@bh-ap2>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz AT lucidpixels DOT
> com> wrote:
> > My thought as well, just wanted someone to confirm ;)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 27 Mar 2008, Jeff Lightner wrote:
> >
> > > I don't think inline copy is what the OP is talking about.
> > >
> > > My read is he wants to multiplex a tape backup with a duplication to
> > > tape from a backup previously written to his disk storage.
> > >
> > > I don't think that is possible since bpbkup and bpduplicate are separate
> > > processes. I haven't attempted it and wouldn't think it advisable to do
> > > it even if it were possible.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> > > [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of
> Justin
> > > Piszcz
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 6:44 PM
> > > To: Andrey Halezov
> > > Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> > > Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] bpduplicate disk => tape. Can running backup
> > > and duplicate share the tape?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Andrey Halezov wrote:
> > >
> > >> Justin,
> > >> Thank you for your answer.
> > >>
> > >> I have available tapes (I rerun "available_media" each time
> > >> bpduplicate failed ).
> > >>
> > >> xbpmon JobMonitor GUI shows currently running backup job, which
> > >> explains why NetBackup can't mount the new tape (I only have one tape
> > >> drive). I am trying to understand why backup and duplicate can't share
> > >> the same tape?
> > >>
> > >> Thank you,
> > >> Andrey
> > >
> > > If you search this list someone did report backing up to a disk storage
> > > unit
> > > and tape at the same time, but you need to use in-line tape copy to do
> > > this.
> > > .. (and also the license for it)
> > >
> > > As for as doing a bpduplicate job while a backup is running when the
> > > only
> > > drive available is being used, I have not tried doing it in that
> > > scenario.
> > > Also NetBackup 3.x?? Did you plan on upgrading anytime soon? :-)
> > >
> > > I see what you want to do.
> > >
> > > Regular backups -------> MPX1 -----> TAPE
> > > \------> MPX2 -----> TAPE
> > > /------> MPX3 -----> TAPE
> > > Duplicate from /-------> MPX4 -----> TAPE
> > > Disk
> > >
> > > However, I have not tried this, anyone else on the list try this with
> > > one one tape drive available?
> > >
> > > He wants to multiplex a duplicate job from disk -> tape while other jobs
> > > are running to that tape as well.
> > >
> > > Justin.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> > > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> > > ----------------------------------
> > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or
> confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended
> recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and
> may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error,
> please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in
> error, and delete it. Thank you.
> > > ----------------------------------
> > >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
|
