On Sun, 16 Dec 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:

> 6.0MP5 is by far buggier than 6.0MP4 (imo)
>
> On Sun, 16 Dec 2007, Martin Ruslan wrote:
>
>> Maybe 6.0 mp5 better?
>> 
>> 
>> On Dec 16, 2007 4:29 AM, Sean Mohr <sean.mohr AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
>> 
>>> We have been running 6.0 mp4 for 3 months and have had nothing but
>>> problems.
>>> 
>>> We are going to move to 6.5 in jan.   It cannot be worse than 6.0MP4.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Dec 13, 2007 4:21 PM, Brooks, Jason < brooksje AT longwood DOT edu> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I've been running 6.5 since mid September without any significant cases
>>>> open.  Nothing at all like what I kept finding in 6.0.
>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>>>>> [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf
>>>>> Of pcuringa AT parker DOT com
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 4:20 PM
>>>>> To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>>>>> Subject: [Veritas-bu] (no subject)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Is  6.5 netbackup stable, or is 6.0 with MP4 better to upgrade to ?
>>>>>

If you pull the bug report fixes from Symantec there are many problems
that 6.0MP5 fixes; however, at least from people who report problems on
this list-- the quantity of (new) bugs introduced by 6.0MP5 seems to
overweigh the "many fixes" in 6.0MP5.

Does anyone have a good experience with 6.0MP5 over 6.0MP4 on this list?

Poll: What is the current 'best' version? 6.0MP4, 6.0MP5, or 6.5?

Justin.

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu