I've been asked to configure a Netbackup 5.1 backup solution for a 3 way
Netware 6.x cluster. One of the Netware servers would be configured as
an NDMP Media server. Before I dive into the documentation, can anyone
tell me if Netbackup in this configuration is Cluster aware?
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of
veritas-bu-request AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 6:22 AM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 18, Issue 30
Send Veritas-bu mailing list submissions to
veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
veritas-bu-request AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
You can reach the person managing the list at
veritas-bu-owner AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Veritas-bu digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. reference to path doesn't exist (Dustin Damour)
2. Re: NetBackup 6.5 and Exchange 2007
(Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills))
3. Re: reference to path doesn't exist (Humenik, Joe - BLS)
4. NetBackup 6.5 for VMware - Failed to get VM Server Info
List
(emapola)
5. NetBackup 6.5 and Exchange 2007 (emapola)
6. Using Flashbackup on windows 2003? (emapola)
7. Re: Using Flashbackup on windows 2003? (Chapman, Scott)
8. Re: Tapeless backup environments? (A Darren Dunham)
9. Restore must be resumed prior to first image expiration (dy018)
10. NBU 6.5 - SAP Restore interface (Mellor, Adam A.)
11. Ha: Re: LotusNotes backup strategy (Anton V Panyushkin)
12. Re: NetBackup 6.5 and Exchange 2007 (WEAVER, Simon (external))
13. Backiing up FreeBSD v6.2 (Jenner, Steven)
14. Windows MP install HELP (Clooney, David)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:22:20 -0600
From: "Dustin Damour" <dustind AT plateautel DOT com>
Subject: [Veritas-bu] reference to path doesn't exist
To: <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Message-ID:
<9526CA167EA43B4EA87A10A1A0F54FF9086EFDAD AT DELIVERANCE.plateautel DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
This is for NetBackup 6.5 Linux
Every day I'm getting the following errors:
10/16/2007 07:02:56 ptclvsbkp01.nmplateaugsm.com -
sts_get_lsu_prop_byname on LSU /csg failed: 2060013 no more entries
10/16/2007 07:02:56 ptclvsbkp01.nmplateaugsm.com - Invalid storage
device: /csg no more entries
10/16/2007 07:02:56 ptclvsbkp01.nmplateaugsm.com - failure to open disk
at path /csg: plug-in reports error 2060013 no more entries
10/16/2007 07:02:56 ptclvsbkp01.nmplateaugsm.com - volume /csg does not
exist or is not available.
Path /csg doesn't exist, at one time it did but at the beginning it was
changed and split in two to /csg01 and /csg02. How would I get rid of
the /csg reference within Netbackup so it doesn't throw these errors
again?
Dustin D'Amour
Wireless Switching
Plateau Wirelesss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20071016/
3e491d85/attachment.html
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:52:08 -0400
From: "Cruice, Daniel \(US - Glen Mills\)" <dcruice AT deloitte DOT com>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 and Exchange 2007
To: "Rajmund Siwik" <Rajmund.Siwik AT conexant DOT com>,
<VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Message-ID:
<6B8F3822F3D38F49B456F0040A70A0EA30A333 AT USATRAME0416.atrame.deloitte DOT com
>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
You will need to go to 6.5 if you plan to backup the Storage groups via
NBU, MS changed the database layout, now as to how to:...not quite sure,
however what we have been doing to get around this in the meantime is
creating a ntbackup job (assuming you have enough space) and backing up
the SG locally, then having NBU back that up to tape. You can use task
scheduler to perform the NTbackup. I'm sure there are somewhite papers
on how to...
Thanks
Dan
From: Rajmund Siwik [mailto:Rajmund.Siwik AT conexant DOT com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 12:55 PM
To: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 and Exchange 2007
Hi All,
My Exchange guy is pushing to upgrade his EX to 2007 and I have to
provide a solution. Currently we have NBU 6.5MP4 so I need to go to 6.5.
Has anybody tried it and can share some thoughts, problems, gotchas?
TIA
--Rajmund
Conexant E-mail Firewall (Conexant.Com) made the following annotations
---------------------------------------------------------------------
********************** Legal Disclaimer ****************************
"This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the
sole use of the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or
distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received the
message in error, please advise the sender by reply email and delete the
message. Thank you."
**********************************************************************
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should
delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action
based on it, is strictly prohibited.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20071016/
de9e564c/attachment.htm
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:00:21 -0400
From: "Humenik, Joe - BLS" <Humenik.Joe AT bls DOT gov>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] reference to path doesn't exist
To: "Dustin Damour" <dustind AT plateautel DOT com>,
<veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Message-ID:
<11C64B18E4E93049BD58E8532CA9FE7F09803B72 AT psbexmb1.psb.bls DOT gov>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Is it in an include list?
Joe Humenik
Humenik.Joe AT bls DOT gov
Because e-mail can be altered electronically,
the integrity of this communication cannot be
guaranteed.
________________________________
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Dustin
Damour
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 1:22 PM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] reference to path doesn't exist
This is for NetBackup 6.5 Linux
Every day I'm getting the following errors:
10/16/2007 07:02:56 ptclvsbkp01.nmplateaugsm.com -
sts_get_lsu_prop_byname on LSU /csg failed: 2060013 no more entries
10/16/2007 07:02:56 ptclvsbkp01.nmplateaugsm.com - Invalid
storage device: /csg no more entries
10/16/2007 07:02:56 ptclvsbkp01.nmplateaugsm.com - failure to
open disk at path /csg: plug-in reports error 2060013 no more entries
10/16/2007 07:02:56 ptclvsbkp01.nmplateaugsm.com - volume /csg
does not exist or is not available.
Path /csg doesn't exist, at one time it did but at the beginning
it was changed and split in two to /csg01 and /csg02. How would I get
rid of the /csg reference within Netbackup so it doesn't throw these
errors again?
Dustin D'Amour
Wireless Switching
Plateau Wirelesss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20071016/
3d5637d9/attachment.html
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:49:29 -0700
From: emapola <netbackup-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 for VMware - Failed to get VM
Server Info List
To: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Message-ID: <1192564168.m2f.179564 AT www.backupcentral DOT com>
Hi,
this afternoon tech guys told me to increase gui timeout to 400.
It didn't work, after that i try to increase it to 500 ("bpdown" and
"bpup") and finally it work.
With 500 of timeout i'm able to query my vm machine into virtualcenter
and add it to the policy.
Just after close the policy and wait untill the autocheck feature finish
i've tried to reopen the policy and add anothe vm machine, it didin't
work and say me "failed to get vm ..".
Close nbu gui, reopen it and retry and it work.
I was able to reproduce this error 4 times.
Any suggestion?
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by emanuele.pola AT centrocomputer DOT it via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:57:44 -0700
From: emapola <netbackup-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 and Exchange 2007
To: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Message-ID: <1192564664.m2f.179565 AT www.backupcentral DOT com>
Hi @ all,
into one of my client site i was able to correctly backup and restore
information store of exchange 2007.
The enviroment is:
NBU 6.5 master+media on windows 2003 x32 std sp2, connected to ibm 3494
with 2 3592 drives.
Exchange 2007 is on 4 server (mscs cluster) windows 2003 ee X64 sp2 with
nbu 6.5 client on it.
ever test we done work, unfortunately single mailbox backup and restore
isn't possible with 6.5 but full information store (or pubblic folder)
works.
Regards
Emanuele Pola
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by emanuele.pola AT centrocomputer DOT it via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:02:05 -0700
From: emapola <netbackup-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Using Flashbackup on windows 2003?
To: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Message-ID: <1192564925.m2f.179566 AT www.backupcentral DOT com>
Hi,
may i use flashbackup on windows 2003 client?
My fileserver is ~3.500.000 files! and it's os is windows 2003 EE x64
sp2.
Regards
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by emanuele.pola AT centrocomputer DOT it via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:13:42 -0700
From: "Chapman, Scott" <Scott.Chapman AT icbc DOT com>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Using Flashbackup on windows 2003?
To: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Message-ID:
<ED17D32A03EEB74482E4C920A5AE860602BB1466 AT EX02VS299.icbc DOT net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I am running flashbackup on 2 x 2003 servers, it works great....they
aren't however, the 64 bit OS, just the 32 bit version...
Scott Chapman
ICBC - Victoria, Government St.
Phone: 250.414.7650 Cell: 250.213.9295
-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of emapola
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 1:02 PM
To: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Using Flashbackup on windows 2003?
Hi,
may i use flashbackup on windows 2003 client?
My fileserver is ~3.500.000 files! and it's os is windows 2003 EE x64
sp2.
Regards
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by emanuele.pola AT centrocomputer DOT it via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 22:39:23 +0000
From: A Darren Dunham <ddunham AT taos DOT com>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Tapeless backup environments?
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Message-ID: <20071016223922.GA16205 AT SDF.LONESTAR DOT ORG>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 12:09:30AM -0400, bob944 wrote:
> One of us still doesn't understand this. :-)
>
> Your blog raises a red herring in misunderstanding or misrepresenting
> the applicability of Birthday Paradox. The number of possible values
in
> BP is 366; there is no data reduction in it, no key values.
The 366 isn't the data space, it's the keyspace. When we look at a
person's birthday, we're hashing them into that space. The "paradox"
then is how many people can we hash before the chance of a "collision"
is significant.
Obviously if 400 people are in a room, the number of values exceeds the
keyspace and the probability of a collision is greater than 1.
> An
> algorithm which reduced the 366 possibilities the same way that
hashing
> 8KB down to 160 bits would yield infinitesimal keys smaller than one
> bit, an absurdity.
I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean with that sentence.
> An absurdity which should show that even if it
> stopped at eight bits, one short of the bits required to hold 1-366,
> there would still be fatal hash collisions--say, Feb 7, Feb 11 and Jun
> 30 all represented by the same code, in which case you can't figure
out
> if people in the room have the same birthday.
What is stopping at 8 bits? Hash collisions can always occur. The
question is what is the probability.
> What you must grasp is that it is *impossible* to
> represent/re-create/look up the values of 2^65536 bits in fewer than
> 2^65536 bits--unless you concede that each checksum/hash/fingerprint
> will represent many different values of the original data--any more
than
> you can represent three bits of data with two.
I think everyone aknowledges that as a fact.
> Hashing is a technique for saving time in certain circumstances. It
is
> valueless in re-creating (and a lookup is a re-creation) original data
> when those data can have unlimited arbitrary values.
The argument is that a process does not have to be infallible to be
valuable, much like the electrical and mechanical processes we currently
use. That if the chance of failure in the algorithm is much less then
the chance of other parts of the system introducing silent data
corruption, then the overall amount of data loss is not significantly
changed.
--
Darren Dunham ddunham AT taos DOT com
Senior Technical Consultant TAOS http://www.taos.com/
Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area
< This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. >
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:07:49 -0700
From: dy018 <netbackup-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Restore must be resumed prior to first image
expiration
To: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Message-ID: <1192583269.m2f.179573 AT www.backupcentral DOT com>
Hi,
Anyone encounter such a error during restore?
My Master is using NBU6.0MP4
My Client is using NBU5.1MP6 - WINNT Client
I tried restore small files and its ok but when i restoring some folders
with bigger files, i cant. Is this a bug or are there setting need to
set during restore? I check the log and got network connection timeout,
desipte setting the CLIENT_READ timeout from 300 to 1800, its still the
same. :(
TIME SERVER/CLIENT TEXT
10/17/2007 08:57:41 F7CBS01 sgsmpcimmsrms09-bk Media id SB0004 is
needed for
the restore.
10/17/2007 08:59:01 F3CBS02 sgsmpcimmsrms09-bk begin reading backup id
sgsmpcimmsrms09-bk_1192581835 (restore), copy 1,
fragment
1 from media id SB0004 on drive index 7
10/17/2007 09:04:03 F3CBS02 sgsmpcimmsrms09-bk The following
files/folders were
not restored:
10/17/2007 09:04:03 F3CBS02 sgsmpcimmsrms09-bk UTF -
/D/ORACLE_BACKUPS/Set3/CONTROFILE.BKP
10/17/2007 09:04:03 F3CBS02 sgsmpcimmsrms09-bk UTF -
/D/ORACLE_BACKUPS/Set3/RMS_ARCHLOGS_RMAN_6089.BKP
10/17/2007 09:04:04 F3CBS02 sgsmpcimmsrms09-bk UTF -
/D/ORACLE_BACKUPS/Set3/RMS_DB_RMAN_6086.BKP
10/17/2007 09:04:04 F3CBS02 sgsmpcimmsrms09-bk UTF -
/D/ORACLE_BACKUPS/Set3/RMS_DB_RMAN_6087.BKP
10/17/2007 09:04:04 F3CBS02 sgsmpcimmsrms09-bk UTF -
/D/ORACLE_BACKUPS/Set3/RMS_DB_RMAN_6088.BKP
10/17/2007 09:04:05 F7CBS01 sgsmpcimmsrms09-bk Restore must be resumed
prior to
first image expiration on Wed Oct 24 08:43:55 2007
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by dy_lan018 AT yahoo DOT com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 09:35:19 +0800
From: "Mellor, Adam A." <Adam.Mellor AT woodside.com DOT au>
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5 - SAP Restore interface
To: <VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Message-ID:
<55A93A8FDF17844FBD201175FB138CC604D313B0 AT permls07.wde.woodside.com DOT au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Good morning,
I have been asked by our SAP administrators for information regarding a
GUI to perform SAP restores in NBU 6.5.
Previously in 4.5 and 5.1 they have been using the xbp utility to
perform the file selections they need, however the java interfaces will
not show up SAP backups.
What tools do people use to select files for restores ?
Does anybody know of a better interface ?
Many thanks,
Adam Mellor
Senior Unix Support Analyst
CF IT TECHNOLOGY SERVICES
Woodside Energy Ltd.
NOTICE: This email and any attachments are confidential.
They may contain legally privileged information or
copyright material. You must not read, copy, use or
disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an
intended recipient, please contact us at once by return
email and then delete both messages and all attachments.
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 09:09:03 +0400
From: Anton V Panyushkin <APanyushkin AT beeline DOT ru>
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Ha: Re: LotusNotes backup strategy
To: Karl.Rossing AT federated DOT ca
Cc: Steve Quan <sq01 AT yorku DOT ca>,
veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu,
veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu, Jon Bousselot
<jon_bousselot AT sd.vrtx DOT com>
Message-ID:
<OFE5460AB7.C7F86220-ONC3257377.001BE0F5-C3257377.001C4B7A@*.beeline.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
????????????,
We have installed dedicated GbE network card into Domino server and take
advantage of multistream backup by using NEW_STREAM directive. Every
stream
goes to its respective tape drive. So overall backup spead is about
50-60
Mb/s. Network card utilization is about 80%. That looks great!
? ?????????,
????? ????????,
8 962 998 90 67
apanyushkin AT beeline DOT ru
veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu ???????? 16.10.2007 18:10:41:
>
> We have several Domino servers and have been able to utilise point
> in time restores.
>
> Our win2k3 mail server backs up 350GB at 10-12MB/sec using the notes
> agent. Doing an off-line backup we are able to do 25-30MB/Sec
>
> We are hoping to move our mail server in the new year back to
> Solaris. We hopefully should see 25-30MB/sec backup times.
>
> We still do nightly FULLS and have touched lightly on daily notes
> transaction only backups. They seem to work fine.
>
> Our notes admin will be implementing a notes archive server before
> year end. The hope is that our daily mail backup volume will
> decrease and that we can move data to the archive server on a
> quarterly basis. The archive server will be backed up quarterly
> while the email server will be backed up daily. I don't think we
> will be using veritas Vault.
>
> Karl
>
> veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu wrote on 10/05/2007 01:48:09
PM:
>
> > We use the notes agent, and write about 380GB of data to tape,
coming
> > from two servers. The mailboxes are split by alphabet. Average
> > throughput to tape is about 8 to 10 MB/sec from each client, and we
do
a
> > full backup every night. We keep the weekend fulls at a different
> > retention than the weekdays, and backing up this much data makes a
> > recovery very simple. I have reviewed the incremental notes backup,
and
> > it appears to only get the transaction logs. We have not tested a
> > restore from this type of backup, so I don't know how well it works.
I
> > think we might just be lucky so far that we've never needed to roll
a
> > data file forward from logs. Usually we're restoring the entire
..nsf
> > file and letting users attach to the current and previous one to
manage
> > the differences.
> >
> > Along with the full .nsf backups for mail, we also get the
transaction
> > logs. I don't think I've ever needed to use them.
> >
> > -Jon
> >
> >
> >
> > > Hi Boris,
> > >
> > > We did transaction log bkups until recently, as we were never able
to
get
> > > our "point in time" recoveries to work. I suspect that it's
> because of the
> > > length of time it takes to do the database backup (couple of
> days for just
> > > over 1TB over the LAN). We also multi-streamed the transaction and
> > > database backups to ensure that the transaction log file(s) would
be
> > > reinitialized.
> > >
> > > I'm still VERY interested in seeing how other sites are doing
their
Notes
> > > backups/restores.
> > >
> > > /Steve
> > > ---
> > > On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Boris Kraizman wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >> > Hi Steve,
> > >> >
> > >> > I have to get back to this topic. Do you do transaction log
> backups using
> > >> > NBU add-on database agent for Lotus Notes? How it works for
you?
We are
> > >> > still doing file level backups with regular NBU client for
> Windows. I was
> > >> > asked to evaluate transactional log backups as well, we have a
few
mail
> > >> > servers with 0.5TB data on each. We backup them over LAN, I am
> > thinking to
> > >> > convert them into SAN media backup servers. Any useful
> information on how
> > >> > you do the backup for Domino environment would be really
helpful.
> > >> >
> > >> > I saw Jerry also responded on this topic. Jerry, could you
> please be more
> > >> > detail how you do VSS or I can see you do the array based
solution
with
> > >> > local copy cloning, correct?
> > >> >
> > >> > Does anybody do transactional log backups for Domino Notes?
> Any pros and
> > >> > cons?
> > >> >
> > >> > Curtis? maybe you can get back on this one.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thank you,
> > >> > Boris
> > >> >
> > >> > On 5/15/07, Steve Quan <sq01 AT yorku DOT ca> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> Hi,
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> We've been "wrestling" with this for quite some time, and
> > very curious to
> > >>> >> see how other sites are managing their Lotus Notes backups.
> > We're running
> > >>> >> NBU6.0 MP4 (servers and clients). The database is just over
> > 1TB and we do
> > >>> >> transaction log backups.
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> Thanks,
> > >>> >> /Steve
> > >>> >> _______________________________________________
> > >>> >> Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> > >>> >> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> > >>> >>
> > >>>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> > > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 06:46:13 +0100
From: "WEAVER, Simon (external)" <simon.weaver AT astrium.eads DOT net>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 and Exchange 2007
To: "'VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu'"
<VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Message-ID:
<7421086474A3DB4989F94A88D2F7F19861647A AT VSMAIL1.uk.astrium DOT corp>
Content-Type: text/plain
Single Mailbox Backups = A lot of problems.
Info Store Backup = A lot faster, reliable, better!
Sorry, not a fan of BLB (Brick Level Backups) and never will be !
Use the features built into Exchange for Mailbox recovery my friend !
Save
you time, save you money :-) Make users happy :-)
Regards
Regards
Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator
EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)
Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU
Email: Simon.Weaver AT Astrium.eads DOT net
-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of emapola
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 8:58 PM
To: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 and Exchange 2007
Hi @ all,
into one of my client site i was able to correctly backup and restore
information store of exchange 2007.
The enviroment is:
NBU 6.5 master+media on windows 2003 x32 std sp2, connected to ibm 3494
with
2 3592 drives.
Exchange 2007 is on 4 server (mscs cluster) windows 2003 ee X64 sp2 with
nbu
6.5 client on it.
ever test we done work, unfortunately single mailbox backup and restore
isn't possible with 6.5 but full information store (or pubblic folder)
works.
Regards
Emanuele Pola
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by emanuele.pola AT centrocomputer DOT it via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or
privileged information or information otherwise protected from
disclosure.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use
it
for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this
message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and
all
liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or
falsified.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
REGISTERED OFFICE:-
Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:30:35 +0100
From: "Jenner, Steven" <Steven.Jenner AT uk.telstra DOT com>
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Backiing up FreeBSD v6.2
To: <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Message-ID:
<5E2CA264644A9B44B12E6B08AA50B0F30702702F AT teusv-msgtab01.uk.core.dir DOT tel
stra.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi,
I have a customer who was running a Redhat Linux server but who has
recently changed to a FreeBSD environment running version 6.2; my
NetBackup environment is running Enterprise v 5.1MP6.
Checking the relevant compatibility matrix I can see that FreeBSD
version 6.0 is covered by v5.1MP6 and my customer believes that this
means that FreeBSD v6.2 should work also (their comments are copied
below)
'The version installed is 6.2 which is the latest version. Although this
is not on the compatibility matrix I would imagine it would be backwards
compatible with 6.0 as it is only a minor version with bug fixes etc.'
I have little experience of FreeBSD therefore cannot ascertain how true
the statement above is; therefore my question is, can FreeBSD v6.2 be
backed up by NetBackup5.1MP6 and if not can it be backed up by any
version of NetBackup?
So far I have installed the NetBackup FreeBSD4.5 client software onto
the client but I am getting status code 54 errors and I believe it is
probably because the applied version of FreeBSD is not covered.
Any help greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Steve.
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20071017/
16894355/attachment.htm
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:21:38 +0100
From: "Clooney, David" <david.clooney AT bankofamerica DOT com>
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Windows MP install HELP
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Message-ID:
<7C12F5796C6A424C936FD35A3C10C6F00175B829 AT ex2k.bankofamerica DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi All
Not so hot on windows and need some help.
Trying to install 5.1 MP6 on a windows 2003 client, currently at 5.1
MP4.
When I launch the installer I don't get the option to "install to this
client only" and it only gives me the network option.
I have tested on my work station and no probs
Any ideas?
Thanks
Dave
Notice to recipient:
The information in this internet e-mail and any attachments is
confidential and may be privileged. It is intended solely for the
addressee. If you are not the intended addressee please notify the
sender immediately by telephone. If you are not the intended recipient,
any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to
be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
When addressed to external clients any opinions or advice contained in
this internet e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed
in any applicable governing terms of business or client engagement
letter issued by the pertinent Bank of America group entity.
If this email originates from the U.K. please note that Bank of America,
N.A., London Branch and Banc of America Securities Limited are
authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20071017/
5608e6c3/attachment.html
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
End of Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 18, Issue 30
******************************************
The information contained in this email message and its attachments
is intended only for the private and confidential use of the
recipient(s) named above, unless the sender expressly agrees
otherwise.
Transmission of email over the Internet is not a secure
communications medium. If you are requesting or have requested the
transmittal of personal data, as defined in applicable privacy laws
by means of email or in an attachment to email, you must select a
more secure alternate means of transmittal that supports your
obligations to protect such personal data.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient and/or
you have received this email in error, you must take no action
based on the information in this email and you are hereby notified
that any dissemination, misuse or copying or disclosure of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by email and
delete the original message.
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
|
