Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Schedule coordination question

2007-08-02 17:38:21
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Schedule coordination question
From: Wayne T Smith <wts AT maine DOT edu>
To: VERITAS-BU AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 17:21:48 -0400
Windows crossing midnight ... kind of like the GhostBusters crossing 
streams ... not healthy.

cheers, wayne

dbwallis wrote, in part,  on 2007-08-02 5:02 PM:
> Greenberg, Katherine (... wrote:
>   
>> It will do it by default, based on the backup that has not run in the
>> longest time being run first.
>>
>>
>> http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/268644.htm
>>
>>     
>
>
> This is what I see happening:
>
> The full backup window is 8:00 am Tuesday to 8:00 am Wednesday. Daily 
> incrementals run from 6:00 pm to 6:00 am daily.
>
> The full backups kick off at the scheduled time. 6:00 pm rolls around, and 
> since the fulls are still running, the incrementals queue up. They don't 
> actually start running until sometime early Wednesday. Come 6:00 Wednesday 
> night, some incrementals are still running, and some of the Wednesday night 
> incrementals get delayed, and sometimes it takes days for everything to get 
> caught up.
>
> SInce there isn't much need to run a full and incremental on the same file 
> system at the same time, I'd prefer just to skip the incrementals on Tuesday 
> (and Wednesday too, for that matter, since the full backups can run into 
> Wednesday sometimes) to avoid this problem.
>   
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu