Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Resource overheads.

2007-07-12 21:13:09
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Resource overheads.
From: "Ed Wilts" <ewilts AT ewilts DOT org>
To: "'Clem Kruger \(C\)'" <KrugerC2 AT telkom.co DOT za>, <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:54:21 -0500

These rules of thumb are in the NetBackup Backup Planning and Performance Tuning Guide at http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/281842.htm

 

               …/Ed

--

Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA

mailto:ewilts AT ewilts DOT org

I GoodSearch for Bundles Of Love:  http://www.goodsearch.com/?charityid=821118

 

From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Clem Kruger (C)
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 7:11 AM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Resource overheads.

 

Morning all,

 

Does anyone have the overhead cost of the recourses we use everyday?

 

e.g.

 

  1. LTO tape drive requires a processor and 750KB memory to drive the tape drive
  2. 2 X 2GB HBA's requires a processor and 500KB memory etc.

I want to create a rule of thumb that we can give to planner to ensure that the hardware they specify will do the job they say it will!.

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>