Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows flash-backup experiences (again)

2007-07-11 09:55:21
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows flash-backup experiences (again)
From: "Martin, Jonathan" <JMARTI05 AT intersil DOT com>
To: "Ed Wilts" <ewilts AT ewilts DOT org>, <ida3248b AT post.cybercity DOT dk>, <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:42:43 -0400
Netbackup isn't installed as a clustered resource.  It runs on all nodes
independent of one another. Why would cluster configuration be any
different then a plain build on Windows?

-Jonathan
 

-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 8:54 AM
To: ida3248b AT post.cybercity DOT dk; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows flash-backup experiences (again)

We absolutely love it.  On average, our backups complete in about half
the time using Flash than using non-Flash backups.  The load on the
client for us is significantly less using Flash so it's a win all
around.  Our environment is lots and lots of little files and on a 1TB
volume, we can easily see over 30 million files.

The only con we've found is that some Windows sysadmins don't have any
experiences setting up the Windows side of the configurations -
especially on clusters - and keep asking us for how it should be
configured.  We refer them back to Microsoft :-).  

We're using Flashbackup on Solaris as well and found it even better than
Windows.  Perhaps that's because with our Solaris admins, the snapshots
worked the first time :-)

        .../Ed

--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:ewilts AT ewilts DOT org
I GoodSearch for Bundles Of Love:
http://www.goodsearch.com/?charityid=821118 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [mailto:veritas-bu- 
> bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of 
> ida3248b AT post.cybercity DOT dk
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 3:26 AM
> To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] Windows flash-backup experiences (again)
> 
> Hello All
> 
> As we have some windows file-servers which backup performance are very

> poor.
> 
> We have been thinking about using Flashbackup-Windows, so I would like

> to hear others experiences with this.
> 
> I am specially interested in times compared to normal file backup and 
> load on the clients compared to normal file backup.
> 
> The drives in question are about a 1 TB each. Any cons using flash- 
> backup ?
> 
> 
> Regards
> Michael

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu