[Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 6, Issue 22


-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
veritas-bu-request at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Sent: 12 October 2006 16:35
To: veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 6, Issue 22

Send Veritas-bu mailing list submissions to
        veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        veritas-bu-request at mailman.eng.auburn.edu

You can reach the person managing the list at
        veritas-bu-owner at mailman.eng.auburn.edu

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Veritas-bu digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. error 71 (Haskins, Steve)
   2. Re: script writing for netbackup (Darren Dunham)
   3. Re: Keeping tape mounted between backups (Iverson, Jerald)
   4. Re: error 71 (Major, Rusty)
   5. Re: error 71 (WEAVER, Simon)
   6. Re: error 71 (WEAVER, Simon)
   7. Re: error 71 (Christopher Jay Manders)
   8. Re: NOM on Solaris 10? (Sponsler, Michael)
   9. Re: error 71 (Haskins, Steve)
  10. Re: Keeping tape mounted between backups (Sponsler, Michael)
  11. Re: Keeping tape mounted between backups (Tom Burrell)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 08:00:41 -0700
From: "Haskins, Steve" <Steve.Haskins at bannerhealth.com>
Subject: [Veritas-bu] error 71
To: <veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu>
Message-ID:
        
<5A5A59FDAFF12744A1DF88A54D26868883DB0A at PHX01106.bhs.bannerhealth.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hello,
 
  Has anyone experienced an error 71 and been able to resolve it? I am
running Netbackup 5.1MP5 on a Windows system and the client(s) are all
Windows. I opened a case a few years back and the resolution was to
update the client to the same level as the backend but in this case the
error started AFTER updating the client to the same version as the
master/media servers.
 
Regards and thanks,
Steve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20061012/
248b3afc/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 08:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Darren Dunham <ddunham at taos.com>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] script writing for netbackup
To: Veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Message-ID: <200610121501.IAA03611 at redwood.taos.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

> need to learn writing scripting using perl in
> netbackup, guide me pls.

That's a rather broad category.  What area are you concerned about?

Do you know perl and netbackup already?  I don't think this forum is
appropriate for teaching perl (or any language's) basics.

What do you want to accomplish?  NBU has many command line interfaces
that are appropriate for automation tools.  'vmquery', 'bpmedialist',
'bpimagelist', 'bppllist' are all especially useful for gathering
information.  And 'vmchange', 'bpexpdate', 'bpduplicate', 'vmphyinv' and
others are useful for making updates and modifications to the
configuration.  The man pages are the best start for those tools, but
some of the output formats are not documented.  You can usually find
them with some good google searching.

-- 
Darren Dunham                                           ddunham at taos.com
Senior Technical Consultant         TAOS            http://www.taos.com/
Got some Dr Pepper?                           San Francisco, CA bay area
         < This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. >


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:07:56 -0500
From: "Iverson, Jerald" <Jerald.Iverson at aiminvestments.com>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Keeping tape mounted between backups
To: "Sponsler, Michael" <Michael.Sponsler at ngc.com>,
        <veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu>
Message-ID:
        
<31AE5FB7B4D79240853EE626D1C614F2012F3FF8 at ushouxmb02.corp.amvescap.net>
        
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

we used to use this in 3.4 and 4.5, it may still work in 5.x or 6.0. put
it in bp.conf. i think the delay number is in seconds, we only needed
the tape to stay in a short while as the next oracle stream would start
within a minute.

 

# stop tape from immediately unmounting for oracle backup/restores:

MEDIA_UNMOUNT_DELAY = 60

 

thanks,

jerald

 

________________________________

From: veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
Sponsler, Michael
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 9:26 AM
To: veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Keeping tape mounted between backups

 

All,

Is there a way to have netbackup keep the tape in drive of a robotic
library?  I'm doing hourly backups of the Oracle Archive Log, and the
tape gets unmounted and put back into it's slot after the backup is
completed.  Is there a way to tell netbackup to keep the tape in the
drive until the tape is full?  We did that with Legato, and now the we
have moved to netbackup we are concerned about the wear and tear on the
tape drive.  Since it's constantly mounting and unmounting the same
tape.

 

--

Mike Sponsler

Northrop Grumman

Michael.Sponsler at ngc.com.

 


Confidentiality Note: The information contained in this message, and any
attachments, may contain confidential and/or privileged material. It is
intended
solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed. Any review,
retransmission, dissemination, or taking of any action in reliance upon
this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and
delete
the material from any computer.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20061012/
bcf00856/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:13:20 -0500
From: "Major, Rusty" <RMajor at vericenter.com>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] error 71
To: "Haskins, Steve" <Steve.Haskins at bannerhealth.com>,
        <veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu>
Message-ID:
        
<5898D448F8A72846A19BD8251D01B8DE016674B4 at vchouxch02.vcdom.vericenter.co
m>
        
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Starting with the basics: 71 is none of the files in the file list
exist. What is in your file list and is there anything in that location
on the client?
 
-Rusty

________________________________

From: veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Haskins,
Steve
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 10:01 AM
To: veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] error 71


Hello,
 
  Has anyone experienced an error 71 and been able to resolve it? I am
running Netbackup 5.1MP5 on a Windows system and the client(s) are all
Windows. I opened a case a few years back and the resolution was to
update the client to the same level as the backend but in this case the
error started AFTER updating the client to the same version as the
master/media servers.
 
Regards and thanks,
Steve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20061012/
4c2fb3ec/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:16:12 +0100
From: "WEAVER, Simon" <simon.weaver at astrium.eads.net>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] error 71
To: "'Haskins, Steve'" <Steve.Haskins at bannerhealth.com>,
        veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Message-ID:
        
<06F68E0112FAD611839400508BAF1B33091954B6 at mms12032.pth.uk.astrium.corp>
        
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"


Steve
What does it complain about for status 71 - is it system state, drive
letter?
Whats defined in the Policy?
 
As a test, have you created a TEST Policy, added the client into this
policy
and attempted a backup?
 
Thanks
 
Regards

Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)
Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU

Email:  <mailto:Simon.Weaver at Astrium-eads.net>
Simon.Weaver at Astrium-eads.net

-----Original Message-----
From: Haskins, Steve [mailto:Steve.Haskins at bannerhealth.com] 
Sent: 12 October 2006 16:01
To: veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] error 71


Hello,
 
  Has anyone experienced an error 71 and been able to resolve it? I am
running Netbackup 5.1MP5 on a Windows system and the client(s) are all
Windows. I opened a case a few years back and the resolution was to
update
the client to the same level as the backend but in this case the error
started AFTER updating the client to the same version as the
master/media
servers.
 
Regards and thanks,
Steve



This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or
privileged information or information otherwise protected from
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do
not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but
delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium
disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus
corrupted, altered or falsified.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS,
England
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20061012/
2675d4c0/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:18:09 +0100
From: "WEAVER, Simon" <simon.weaver at astrium.eads.net>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] error 71
To: "'Haskins, Steve'" <Steve.Haskins at bannerhealth.com>,
        veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Message-ID:
        
<06F68E0112FAD611839400508BAF1B33091954B7 at mms12032.pth.uk.astrium.corp>
        
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"


Steve
Also found this; http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/277438.htm
<http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/277438.htm> 
 
Not sure if you have had a look at this or not.....

Regards

Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)
Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU

Email:  <mailto:Simon.Weaver at Astrium-eads.net>
Simon.Weaver at Astrium-eads.net

-----Original Message-----
From: Haskins, Steve [mailto:Steve.Haskins at bannerhealth.com] 
Sent: 12 October 2006 16:01
To: veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] error 71


Hello,
 
  Has anyone experienced an error 71 and been able to resolve it? I am
running Netbackup 5.1MP5 on a Windows system and the client(s) are all
Windows. I opened a case a few years back and the resolution was to
update
the client to the same level as the backend but in this case the error
started AFTER updating the client to the same version as the
master/media
servers.
 
Regards and thanks,
Steve



This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or
privileged information or information otherwise protected from
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do
not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but
delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium
disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus
corrupted, altered or falsified.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS,
England
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20061012/
68c594e1/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 08:27:36 -0700
From: Christopher Jay Manders <cjmanders at lbl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] error 71
To: "Haskins, Steve" <Steve.Haskins at bannerhealth.com>
Cc: veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Message-ID: <452E5EE8.3040909 at lbl.gov>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi Steve,

We have so many clients that we see this one every once in a while.

The usual problem is that a filesystem that is in the File List for the 
policy becomes unmounted, changes mount location, mount point becomes 
stale, or the area to be backed up is deleted by the client.

My suggestion is to take the policy file list and go line-by-line 
through them to assure that everything in them is actually on each 
client in that policy. If any one does not exist, then you will get that

error.

Output from 'bperror -U -client <client_name> -problems' may be of help 
in finding the actual area that is not being found.

Hope that helps.

Cheers!

--Chris



> Starting with the basics: 71 is none of the files in the file list 
> exist. What is in your file list and is there anything in that 
> location on the client?
>  
> -Rusty
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
> [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu] *On Behalf Of 
> *Haskins, Steve
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 12, 2006 10:01 AM
> *To:* veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> *Subject:* [Veritas-bu] error 71
>
> Hello,
>  
>   Has anyone experienced an error 71 and been able to resolve it? I am

> running Netbackup 5.1MP5 on a Windows system and the client(s) are all

> Windows. I opened a case a few years back and the resolution was to 
> update the client to the same level as the backend but in this case 
> the error started AFTER updating the client to the same version as the

> master/media servers.
>  
> Regards and thanks,
> Steve
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>
>_______________________________________________
>Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
>http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>  
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20061012/
65f77cb0/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:29:19 -0400
From: "Sponsler, Michael" <Michael.Sponsler at ngc.com>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NOM on Solaris 10?
To: "Gravizi, Thomas" <Thomas_Gravizi at steris.com>,
        <veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu>
Message-ID:
        <F4887DC31FA7F346A7FB50207749D73187F430 at XMBVAD02.northgrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I have NOM MP2 working on a Solaris 10 box.
 
If you do a : /etc/init.d/vxnomd status 

Are all the services running?

Is your NOM server your master server?  If not, add your NOM server in
you bp.conf file as a SERVER=

Also, you need to install the latest solaris 10 patches, more
specifically libc needs to be updated for it to run properly (you'll get
a core dump).  If you do a /usr/ccs/bin/what /lib/libc.so.1 what does
the output say?

-- 
Mike Sponsler 
Northrop Grumman 
Michael.Sponsler at ngc.com 
(703) 968-1302 
12900 Federal Systems Pkwy 
Fairfax, VA 22033 

 


________________________________

From: veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Gravizi,
Thomas
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 10:40 AM
To: veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NOM on Solaris 10?



Greetings,

 

A while backup I installed NOM MP2 on a Solaris 10 box.  For the longest
time, I could not get any of the reporting to show, so I opened a call
with Veritas support.  After many calls, it was stated that NOM for NBU
6.0 does not work properly on Solaris 10 machines.

 

Has anyone been able to get NOM working on Solaris 10 system?  If so, is
there any trick or any specific MP that was used?

 

Thanks in advance,

 

Thomas Gravizi

UNIX Systems Administrator

Enterprise Operations

STERIS Corporation - Mentor, OH

thomas_gravizi at steris.com

440.392.7630 - phone

440.350.7078 - fax

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20061012/
cfa05ea5/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 08:26:24 -0700
From: "Haskins, Steve" <Steve.Haskins at bannerhealth.com>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] error 71
To: "WEAVER, Simon" <simon.weaver at astrium.eads.net>,
        <veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu>
Message-ID:
        
<5A5A59FDAFF12744A1DF88A54D26868883DB0D at PHX01106.bhs.bannerhealth.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Local drive. The client(s) weren't having a problem before the client
version upgrade. Other clients (also updated and existing in the same
policy(s)  aren't having an issue. All Local Drives are defined. It
doesn't specify what what file is missing in the file list in the GUI
detail, I'm assuming it may me a temp file that is reoccurringly
regenerated by the application. 
 
Rusty or Simon, What log would I look in?
________________________________

From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:simon.weaver at astrium.eads.net] 
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 8:16 AM
To: Haskins, Steve; veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] error 71


Steve
What does it complain about for status 71 - is it system state, drive
letter?
Whats defined in the Policy?
 
As a test, have you created a TEST Policy, added the client into this
policy and attempted a backup?
 
Thanks
 
Regards

Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator 

EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)
Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU

Email: Simon.Weaver at Astrium-eads.net
<mailto:Simon.Weaver at Astrium-eads.net> 

        -----Original Message-----
        From: Haskins, Steve [mailto:Steve.Haskins at bannerhealth.com] 
        Sent: 12 October 2006 16:01
        To: veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
        Subject: [Veritas-bu] error 71
        
        
        Hello,
         
          Has anyone experienced an error 71 and been able to resolve
it? I am running Netbackup 5.1MP5 on a Windows system and the client(s)
are all Windows. I opened a case a few years back and the resolution was
to update the client to the same level as the backend but in this case
the error started AFTER updating the client to the same version as the
master/media servers.
         
        Regards and thanks,
        Steve

This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or
privileged information or information otherwise protected from
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do
not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but
delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium
disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus
corrupted, altered or falsified.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS,
England
        
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20061012/
a781d8aa/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 10
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:33:30 -0400
From: "Sponsler, Michael" <Michael.Sponsler at ngc.com>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Keeping tape mounted between backups
To: "Iverson, Jerald" <Jerald.Iverson at aiminvestments.com>,
        <veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu>
Message-ID:
        <F4887DC31FA7F346A7FB50207749D73187F431 at XMBVAD02.northgrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I don't think that MEDIA_UNMOUNT_DELAY works with NBU 6.0 MP2.  Besides,
I don't think the MEDIA_UNMOUNT_DELAY would work for me.  The backup
occurs every hour, and if the tape needs changed, I don't want the full
tape to sit for an hour before it's finaly ejected and a new tape put
in, especially if more data has to spill over to a 2nd tape.
 
--
Mike Sponsler
 

________________________________

From: Iverson, Jerald [mailto:Jerald.Iverson at aiminvestments.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 11:08 AM
To: Sponsler, Michael; veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Keeping tape mounted between backups



we used to use this in 3.4 and 4.5, it may still work in 5.x or 6.0. put
it in bp.conf. i think the delay number is in seconds, we only needed
the tape to stay in a short while as the next oracle stream would start
within a minute.

 

# stop tape from immediately unmounting for oracle backup/restores:

MEDIA_UNMOUNT_DELAY = 60

 

thanks,

jerald

 

________________________________

From: veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
Sponsler, Michael
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 9:26 AM
To: veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Keeping tape mounted between backups

 

All,

Is there a way to have netbackup keep the tape in drive of a robotic
library?  I'm doing hourly backups of the Oracle Archive Log, and the
tape gets unmounted and put back into it's slot after the backup is
completed.  Is there a way to tell netbackup to keep the tape in the
drive until the tape is full?  We did that with Legato, and now the we
have moved to netbackup we are concerned about the wear and tear on the
tape drive.  Since it's constantly mounting and unmounting the same
tape.

 

--

Mike Sponsler

Northrop Grumman

Michael.Sponsler at ngc.com.

 

Confidentiality Note: The information contained in this message, and any
attachments, may contain confidential and/or privileged material. It is
intended
solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed. Any review,
retransmission, dissemination, or taking of any action in reliance upon
this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and
delete
the material from any computer.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20061012/
580a6679/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 11
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 08:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom Burrell <tburrell_mn at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Keeping tape mounted between backups
To: veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Message-ID: <20061012153430.19414.qmail at web54503.mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Michael,

I would suggest that a better option might be a DSSU
for this purpose- you get no mount/unmout time,
typically faster throughput for both backups and
restores, and you can control how often the DSSU
destages to tape.

Tom Burrell
tburrell_mn at yahoo.com

--- "Sponsler, Michael" <Michael.Sponsler at ngc.com>
wrote:

> All,
> Is there a way to have netbackup keep the tape in
> drive of a robotic
> library?  I'm doing hourly backups of the Oracle
> Archive Log, and the
> tape gets unmounted and put back into it's slot
> after the backup is
> completed.  Is there a way to tell netbackup to keep
> the tape in the
> drive until the tape is full?  We did that with
> Legato, and now the we
> have moved to netbackup we are concerned about the
> wear and tear on the
> tape drive.  Since it's constantly mounting and
> unmounting the same
> tape.
>  
> --
> Mike Sponsler
> Northrop Grumman
> Michael.Sponsler at ngc.com.
>  
> > _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  - 
> Veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
>
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu at mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


End of Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 6, Issue 22
*****************************************