[Veritas-bu] SSO Options
2006-05-31 08:48:57
Subject: |
[Veritas-bu] SSO Options |
From: |
JMARTI05 at intersil.com (Martin, Jonathan (Contractor)) |
Date: |
Wed, 31 May 2006 08:48:57 -0400 |
All,
We're running 5.1 MP4 on Windows and UNIX (Solaris 2.8) here, and with
all the budget money flying around I'm looking into adding the SSO
Option. Basically, I would like to add our ATL to the SAN Switch and
have our larger capacity file and database servers then SSO themselves a
free drive and write directly to it.
Essentially replacing
SAN (DATA) --> Client --> 1GB Nic --> Media Server --> (SCSI) ATL/DRIVE#
with
SAN (DATA) --> Client --> SAN --> ATL/DRIVE#
I have a few questions.
#1 - Does running both the Storage Device (Hitachi AMS 500) and SSOing a
drive on in the ATL affect performance? I'm assuming I can easily drive
our SDLT220 drives to capacity using this method, but should I use two
HBAs? (I'm assuming no.)
#2 - Does every server that wants to "grab" a drive need a media server
license? I would only be using these servers daily to run their own
backups - not others. Is this that SSO Media Server license I hear
mentioned every once and a while?
#3 - What's involved in upgrading my regular old Master / Media servers
to SSO (from a software perspective?) Do I have to upgrade everything
to SSO, or simply add a few new SSO Media servers to my current setup?
#4 - Does anyone run SSO on Redhat Linux AS 3? Several of our larger
databases are now Oracle on Linux.
Thanks all!
-Jonathan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20060531/e7d0d1cd/attachment-0001.html
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Veritas-bu] SSO Options,
Martin, Jonathan (Contractor) <=
|
|
|