[Veritas-bu] Can this be done?
2006-05-12 14:57:25
* Jeff Lightner <jlightner AT water DOT com> [2006-05-12 12:55]:
> That's not the culture of this list although it is on others I am
> subscribed to. The downside I've seen to what you propose is that many
> times people do not post the summary so one finds more questions than
> solutions in the archives.
You can already see evidence of gaps in communication. I have seen
several times where a question is asked, and replies are not posted to
the list, only to find a later reply that _does_ make it to the list.
It makes it confusing when you have someone reply to an email that is
NOT in the existing thread.
Also, it's a lot like thumbing through a book. You may not necessarily
be looking for a particular answer, but somethingg that someone says in
the process of working though a question may spark an answer to
something completely different for you. That would never happen if the
thread is divorced from the list.
--
David Rock
david AT graniteweb DOT com
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Veritas-bu] Can this be done?, Bob Stump
- [Veritas-bu] Can this be done?, Jeff Lightner
- [Veritas-bu] Can this be done?,
David Rock <=
- [Veritas-bu] Can this be done?, WEAVER, Simon
- [Veritas-bu] Can this be done?, Martin, Jonathan (Contractor)
- [Veritas-bu] Can this be done?, Deiter Scott
- [Veritas-bu] Can this be done?, DeAnna_nguyen AT comcast DOT net
- [Veritas-bu] Can this be done?, Tristan Ball
- [Veritas-bu] Can this be done?, bob944
|
|
|