Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Performance issue

2006-01-23 11:03:13
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Performance issue
From: Karl.Rossing AT Federated DOT CA (Karl.Rossing AT Federated DOT CA)
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 10:03:13 -0600
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 00582F0C862570FF_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu wrote on 01/23/2006 07:18:06 AM:

> Netbackup version 5.1.4.  Solaris 9 master/media server.
> Our windows file server (win2003) backup has just started taking a 
> very long time for the shadow copy components.  Normally a 10 minute
> backup is now taking over 5 hours.  The backup of the "C" and "P" 
> drive are running at normal times. 

We just went threw poor performance on our lotus notes server. We updated 
the BIOS, raid controller firmware, raid driver, which improved 
performance. We just got threw doing a defrag(98% fragmentation) last 
night. So i'll know tomorrow how much faster it is.

> I'm curious to know if anybody else has seen this after applying the
> windows January patches?

No but we don't patch often either.
--=_alternative 00582F0C862570FF_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"


<br><font size=2><tt>veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu wrote on 
01/23/2006
07:18:06 AM:<br>
<br>
&gt; Netbackup version 5.1.4. &nbsp;Solaris 9 master/media server.</tt></font>
<br><font size=2><tt>&gt; Our windows file server (win2003) backup has
just started taking a <br>
&gt; very long time for the shadow copy components. &nbsp;Normally a 10
minute<br>
&gt; backup is now taking over 5 hours. &nbsp;The backup of the &quot;C&quot;
and &quot;P&quot; <br>
&gt; drive are running at normal times. &nbsp;</tt></font>
<br>
<br><font size=2><tt>We just went threw poor performance on our lotus notes
server. We updated the BIOS, raid controller firmware, raid driver, which
improved performance. We just got threw doing a defrag(98% fragmentation)
last night. So i'll know tomorrow how much faster it is.</tt></font>
<br>
<br><font size=2><tt>&gt; I'm curious to know if anybody else has seen
this after applying the<br>
&gt; windows January patches?</tt></font>
<br>
<br><font size=2><tt>No but we don't patch often either.</tt></font>
--=_alternative 00582F0C862570FF_=--



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>