[Veritas-bu] RE: Netbackup 5.1 MP4 Vault eject failures

Mitch-

When you created the vault (not the profile), did you specify 00_009_TLD as
the robotic volume group? You may need to re-create the actual vault to
point to the robot that is the destination (as opposed to the source, the
VTL)... Which means you may need to add the TLD(9) robot to the Vault
Management tab.

Then, create a profile within that new vault, and specify 00_009_TLD as the
source volume group.

B-

-- 
Brian Blake
Enterprise Consulting Services
Symantec Corporation
brian_blake AT symantec DOT com
Office: (813) 209-3262
Cell: (813) 493-0981
Fax: (650) 527-2210

--__--__--

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:10:00 -0600
From: "Lien, Mitch" <mitch.lien AT medtronic DOT com>
To: <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 5.1 MP4 Vault eject failures

Hi.

We have a Vault duplication job that duplicates Virtual tapes (using a EMC
CDL) onto standard tapes (using 9940B drives/L700 Tape Lib).

Within the Vault Profile, we have 00_009_TLD as the source Volume Group.
This volume group is used by our EMC CDL (Virtual Tape library). The
destination tape library we are duplicating to has a Volume Group of
00_002_TLD. This volume group is used by our STK L700 tape library and has
not been entered into the Vault profile at all.

When we run the Vault duplication everything is working correctly with the
exception of the eject process. The tapes that are suppose to be getting
ejected are not and we are seeing the following in the detail.log of the
Vault session:

13:40:53.646 [8218] GenMediaEjectList(): media M01212 selected but not in
robot group '00_009_TLD', skipping eject
13:40:53.646 [8218] GenMediaEjectList(): media M01443 selected but not in
robot group '00_009_TLD', skipping eject
13:40:53.646 [8218] GenMediaEjectList(): media M01657 selected but not in
robot group '00_009_TLD', skipping eject
13:40:53.646 [8218] GenMediaEjectList(): media M02162 selected but not in
robot group '00_009_TLD', skipping eject


We think the issue has something to do with the "source Volume Group" of
00_009_TLD mentioned above, but are not sure. The first tape, M01212, is in
the 00_002_TLD volume group and we do not know why it cares that it is not
in the 00_009_TLD group.

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks.

Mitch


--__--__--