[Veritas-bu] VTL vs. Disk based backups
2005-12-01 19:19:38
Subject: |
[Veritas-bu] VTL vs. Disk based backups |
From: |
ewilts AT ewilts DOT org (Ed Wilts) |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:19:38 -0600 |
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 08:00:14AM -0500, Paul Keating wrote:
> Suggestions on this ???
>
> I've got that prob......
Hi Paul,
For slow clients, a dssu will work wonders for freeing up tape drive
time. Sometimes there's nothing you can do on a client - it's always
going to be slow (lots of small files on an aging server is a good
example), but at least it can trickle in the background.
We're constantly fighting very large and slow clients - millions of
files on Win2k3 that just can't just feed NBU the data fast enough. We
started with a 24-hour backup and cut that in half by writing to a DSSU.
We cut it in half again with the advanced client (which has lots of
issues but at least the backups are going again).
> > -----Original Message-----
> > Are you just trying to fix slow clients?
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:ewilts AT ewilts DOT org
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Veritas-bu] VTL vs. Disk based backups, Paul Keating
- [Veritas-bu] VTL vs. Disk based backups,
Ed Wilts <=
- [Veritas-bu] VTL vs. Disk based backups, Hindle, Greg
- [Veritas-bu] VTL vs. Disk based backups, Paul Keating
- [Veritas-bu] VTL vs. Disk based backups, Hindle, Greg
- [Veritas-bu] VTL vs. Disk based backups, Paul Keating
- [Veritas-bu] VTL vs. Disk based backups, Ed Wilts
- [Veritas-bu] VTL vs. Disk based backups, Jimmy Jenkins
- [Veritas-bu] VTL vs. Disk based backups, Paul Keating
- [Veritas-bu] VTL vs. Disk based backups, Jorgensen, Bill
|
|
|