Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Scan_Ability and SAN Media Servers

2004-07-09 13:42:40
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Scan_Ability and SAN Media Servers
From: Melanie.Zink AT bankofamerica DOT com (Zink, Melanie)
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 10:42:40 -0700
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--Boundary_(ID_zwq6aesU0cEFK2mVNE65pA)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

There is some mileage in doing this since it keeps the rdevmi processes for the 
shared drives off your application servers and on your NetBackup infrastructure 
servers.

-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [mailto:veritas-bu-admin 
AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu]On Behalf Of David_Attreed AT Countrywide DOT Com
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 12:40 PM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Scan_Ability and SAN Media Servers



Greetings, 

Does anyone know if there is any mileage in lowering the scan_ability setting 
for SAN Media Servers? 

We have the usual environment of several dedicated Media Servers and some SAN 
Media Servers. My thinking is that by making the SAN M/Ss lower priority it 
would encourage the dedicated M/Ss to be the scan hosts for our drives. As 
these SAN M/Ss are used for other stuff (users dataservers, mail servers, etc) 
surely this could lessen the load on the SAN M/Ss and my Master? 

W2K environment running 4.5 FP6. 


Regards,
David Attreed. 


--Boundary_(ID_zwq6aesU0cEFK2mVNE65pA)
Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">


<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1226" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=345563917-09072004><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>There 
is some mileage in doing this since it keeps the rdevmi processes for the 
shared 
drives off your application servers and on your NetBackup infrastructure 
servers.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
  <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma 
  size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> 
  veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu 
  [mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu]<B>On Behalf Of 
  </B>David_Attreed AT Countrywide DOT Com<BR><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, July 08, 
2004 
  12:40 PM<BR><B>To:</B> veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT 
edu<BR><B>Subject:</B> 
  [Veritas-bu] Scan_Ability and SAN Media Servers<BR><BR></FONT></DIV><BR><FONT 
  face=sans-serif size=2>Greetings,</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT face=sans-serif 
  size=2>Does anyone know if there is any mileage in lowering the scan_ability 
  setting for SAN Media Servers? </FONT><BR><BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>We 
  have the usual environment of several dedicated Media Servers and some SAN 
  Media Servers. My thinking is that by making the SAN M/Ss lower priority it 
  would encourage the dedicated M/Ss to be the scan hosts for our drives. As 
  these SAN M/Ss are used for other stuff (users dataservers, mail servers, 
etc) 
  surely this could lessen the load on the SAN M/Ss and my Master?</FONT> 
  <BR><BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>W2K environment running 4.5 FP6.</FONT> 
  <BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2><BR><BR>Regards,<BR>David Attreed.</FONT> 
</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

--Boundary_(ID_zwq6aesU0cEFK2mVNE65pA)--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>