Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Upgrade Media Server host hardware

2004-06-28 10:36:36
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Upgrade Media Server host hardware
From: scoco AT arl.army DOT mil (Coco, Samuel (Cont, ARL/CISD))
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:36:36 -0400
The I/O through the backplane of the V120 is better then that of the 10.
So . . . .
you SHOULD realize an increased throughput.

Thank you,
 
 
Samuel J. Coco, STG
Functional Area Manager, ARL
Sr UNIX Administrator
BELL      301 394-1151 DSN 290
CELL (B) 240 398-7121 / (H)443 496-1623
HOME     410 604-2415
Email  scoco AT arl.army DOT mil


-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of William
Enestvedt
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 10:31 AM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Upgrade Media Server host hardware


Hi, all;
   I have an Ultra 10 acting as a Media Host to a Sun L9 (Quantum DLT
8000) tape library. Would I get better throughput if I put a Sun V120 in
place of the Ultra 10 to drive the L9?
   They both would have memory settings approporiate for NetBackup 3.4
[I know, I know], and both would use a PCI SCSI card.
   Thanks in advance for any replies.
-wde
P.S. Apologies if this is a self-evident question, but I'm expecting a
new baby at home and getting a little thick-witted with the waiting. :7)
--
Will Enestvedt
UNIX System Administrator
Johnson & Wales University -- Providence, RI

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>