This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 006ECF1886256E32_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

What's the advantage to updating to 108725-15 on Solaris 8?

Is it that i don't have to put  the following in my st.conf(veritas 
suggested this for me)?
        tape-config-list=
        "HP Ultrium LTO 2", "HP Ultrium LTO 2", "ULTRIUM2";
        ULTRIUM2 = 1,0x36,0,0xd639,4,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x42,3;
or  as the reply suggested
        "HP Ultrium 2-SCSI","HP Ultrium LTO 2","LTO-data",
        LTO-data =1,0x3b,0,0x2D639,4,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x42,3;

I'm running 
        # showrev -p |grep 108725
        Patch: 108725-07 Obsoletes: 109579-01, 111449-01 Requires: 
108528-11 Incompatibl
        es:  Packages: SUNWcarx, SUNWcsu, SUNWcsr, SUNWcsxu, SUNWhea
        Patch: 108725-13 Obsoletes: 109579-01, 111449-01 Requires: 
108528-11 Incompatibl
        es:  Packages: SUNWcarx, SUNWcsu, SUNWcsr, SUNWcsxu, SUNWhea

Just curious.

Karl

veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu wrote on 02/06/2004 11:31:43 AM:

> I found them, turns out solaris supports them through patches
> 
> Solaris 8 has LTO2 support in patch 108725-15
> Solaris 9 has LTO2 support in patch 113277-17
> 
> "HP Ultrium 2-SCSI","HP Ultrium LTO 2","LTO-data",
>  LTO-data =1,0x3b,0,0x2D639,4,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x42,3;
--=_alternative 006ECF1886256E32_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"


<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">What's the advantage to updating to
</font><font size=2><tt>108725-15</tt></font><font size=2 face="sans-serif">
on Solaris 8?</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Is it that i don't have to put &nbsp;the
following in my st.conf(veritas suggested this for me)?</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 
tape-config-list=</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &quot;HP
Ultrium LTO 2&quot;, &quot;HP Ultrium LTO 2&quot;, &quot;ULTRIUM2&quot;;</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; ULTRIUM2
= 1,0x36,0,0xd639,4,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x42,3;</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">or &nbsp;as the reply suggested</font>
<br><font size=2><tt>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &quot;HP Ultrium
2-SCSI&quot;,&quot;HP Ultrium LTO 2&quot;,&quot;LTO-data&quot;,</tt></font>
<br><font size=2><tt>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; LTO-data 
=1,0x3b,0,0x2D639,4,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x42,3;</tt></font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I'm running </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; #
showrev -p |grep 108725</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Patch:
108725-07 Obsoletes: 109579-01, 111449-01 Requires: 108528-11 Incompatibl</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; es:
&nbsp;Packages: SUNWcarx, SUNWcsu, SUNWcsr, SUNWcsxu, SUNWhea</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Patch:
108725-13 Obsoletes: 109579-01, 111449-01 Requires: 108528-11 Incompatibl</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; es:
&nbsp;Packages: SUNWcarx, SUNWcsu, SUNWcsr, SUNWcsxu, SUNWhea</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Just curious.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Karl</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2><tt>veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu wrote on 
02/06/2004
11:31:43 AM:<br>
<br>
&gt; I found them, turns out solaris supports them through patches</tt></font>
<br><font size=2><tt>&gt; &nbsp;</tt></font>
<br><font size=2><tt>&gt; Solaris 8 has LTO2 support in patch 
108725-15</tt></font>
<br><font size=2><tt>&gt; Solaris 9 has LTO2 support in patch 
113277-17</tt></font>
<br><font size=2><tt>&gt; &nbsp;</tt></font>
<br><font size=2><tt>&gt; &quot;HP Ultrium 2-SCSI&quot;,&quot;HP Ultrium
LTO 2&quot;,&quot;LTO-data&quot;,</tt></font>
<br><font size=2><tt>&gt; &nbsp;LTO-data 
=1,0x3b,0,0x2D639,4,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x42,3;</tt></font>
--=_alternative 006ECF1886256E32_=--