[Veritas-bu] Disk Suite vs. Veritas vol. mgr

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C3DF90.568D2CB5
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"

We are building out an array of ATA disks direct attached to a Sun server 
running Solaris 8 for some disk based backups. Anyone know of any pros & cons 
of using Solaris disk suite vs. Veritas volume manager? Currently I have a lot 
of experience with disk suite. If vol. mgr. is that much better, I will figure 
out how to use that...

Thanks,
Harry S.
Atlanta

------_=_NextPart_001_01C3DF90.568D2CB5
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2655.35">
<TITLE>Disk Suite vs. Veritas vol. mgr</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>We are building out an array of ATA disks direct =
attached to a Sun server running Solaris 8 for some disk based backups. =
Anyone know of any pros &amp; cons of using Solaris disk suite vs. =
Veritas volume manager? Currently I have a lot of experience with disk =
suite. If vol. mgr. is that much better, I will figure out how to use =
that...</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Thanks,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Harry S.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Atlanta</FONT>
</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C3DF90.568D2CB5--

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Veritas-bu] Disk Suite vs. Veritas vol. mgr, Schaefer, Harry <= [Veritas-bu] Disk Suite vs. Veritas vol. mgr, Cornely, David [Veritas-bu] Disk Suite vs. Veritas vol. mgr, Coco, Samuel (Cont, ARL/CISD) [Veritas-bu] Disk Suite vs. Veritas vol. mgr, Broun, Bevan