[Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput
2003-06-23 13:22:08
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C339AB.F9C82460
Content-Type: text/plain
What's your client & file distribution. WinNT is notorious for being slow
when doing 1000's of small files as opposed to fewer, larger files.
I'd play with the buffering & tuning. Make sure to modify both client &
media server when you do so.
-M
-----Original Message-----
From: Moses, Darby [mailto:DMoses AT leviton DOT com]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:54 AM
To: Lowell Fafard
Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput
Tape drive:SDLT scsi
Network:1Gig.
For testing purposes there are no additional clients performing a backup at
the time
The client and server are Dell 4way Pent. 4 servers with gig Ethernet
interfaces.
Thanks,
Darby Moses
Operations
Leviton Mfg.
-----Original Message-----
From: Lowell Fafard [mailto:lfafard AT saskpower DOT com]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:44 PM
To: Moses, Darby
Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput
What are you using for your tape devices? How are they connected? What is
the network speed to the Media Server? Are there multple clients being
backed up to this media server at the same time?
Lowell
"Moses, Darby" <DMoses AT leviton DOT com>
Sent by: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
2003-06-23 10:10 AM
To: "Quarantine" <Quarantine AT GSCCCA DOT ORG>,
<veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
cc:
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput
But should the differences be that large? I have another client that will
ftp to the Veritas server at 15,000KB/s but the Veritas backup is 1000KB/s.
Thanks,
Darby Moses
Operations
Leviton Mfg.
-----Original Message-----
From: Quarantine [mailto:Quarantine AT GSCCCA DOT ORG]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:19 AM
To: Moses, Darby; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput
You shouldn't expect that. Different methods of file access and transfer
have different overheads. For example, download a large FTP file from an
off-network location using Internet Explorer and then download the same file
using a standard FTP client like WS_FTP. You'll usually see a marked
difference. Another comparison is to copy a very large file between Windows
machines using copy/paste from the GUI and then copy the same file using a
utility like robocopy. Windows file handling is notoriously inefficient and
slow.
Matt
________________________________________
From: Moses, Darby [mailto:DMoses AT leviton DOT com]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:10 AM
To: Veritas-BackUp support group
If I can transfer a file using FTP from my Veritas server to a client at
5000 KB/s should I get better than the 1200KB/s throughput I get from
NetBackup for my backups from that client?
Regards,
Darby Moses
Operations
Leviton Mfg.
Phone: (718) 281-6597 Fax: (718) 281-6999
DMOSES AT LEVITON DOT COM WWW.LEVITON.COM
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
------_=_NextPart_001_01C339AB.F9C82460
Content-Type: text/html
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<TITLE>Message</TITLE>
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4926.2500" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=390322017-23062003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>What's
your client & file distribution. WinNT is notorious for being slow
when doing 1000's of small files as opposed to fewer, larger files.
</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=390322017-23062003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=390322017-23062003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>I'd
play with the buffering & tuning. Make sure to modify both client
& media server when you do so. </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=390322017-23062003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=390322017-23062003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>-M</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Moses, Darby
[mailto:DMoses AT leviton DOT com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, June 23, 2003
10:54
AM<BR><B>To:</B> Lowell Fafard<BR><B>Cc:</B>
veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: [Veritas-bu]
NT/WIN2K
FTP&Backup throughput<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=767305116-23062003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Tape
drive:SDLT scsi</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=767305116-23062003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Network:1Gig.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=767305116-23062003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>For
testing purposes there are no additional clients performing a backup at the
time</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=767305116-23062003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>The
client and server are Dell 4way Pent. 4 servers with gig Ethernet
interfaces.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV align=left><FONT face=Arial size=2>Thanks,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV align=left><FONT face=Arial size=2>Darby Moses</FONT></DIV>
<DIV align=left><FONT face=Arial size=2>Operations</FONT></DIV>
<DIV align=left><FONT face=Arial size=2>Leviton Mfg.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Lowell Fafard
[mailto:lfafard AT saskpower DOT com] <BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, June 23,
2003 12:44
PM<BR><B>To:</B> Moses, Darby<BR><B>Cc:</B>
veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE:
[Veritas-bu]
NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput<BR><BR></FONT></DIV><BR><FONT
face=sans-serif size=2>What are you using for your tape devices? How
are they connected? What is the network speed to the Media Server?
Are there multple clients being backed up to this media server at the
same time?</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>Lowell</FONT>
<BR><BR><BR><BR>
<TABLE width="100%">
<TBODY>
<TR vAlign=top>
<TD>
<TD><FONT face=sans-serif size=1><B>"Moses, Darby"
<DMoses AT leviton DOT com></B></FONT> <BR><FONT
face=sans-serif
size=1>Sent by: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu</FONT>
<P><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>2003-06-23 10:10 AM</FONT> <BR></P>
<TD><FONT face=Arial size=1>
</FONT><BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>
To: "Quarantine"
<Quarantine AT GSCCCA DOT ORG>,
<veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu></FONT> <BR><FONT
face=sans-serif size=1> cc:
</FONT> <BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu]
NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup
throughput</FONT></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR><BR><BR><FONT
face="Courier New" size=2>But should the differences be that large? I
have another client that will ftp to the Veritas server at 15,000KB/s but
the Veritas backup is 1000KB/s. <BR><BR>Thanks,<BR>Darby
Moses<BR>Operations<BR>Leviton Mfg.<BR><BR><BR>-----Original
Message-----<BR>From: Quarantine [mailto:Quarantine AT GSCCCA DOT ORG]
<BR>Sent:
Monday, June 23, 2003 11:19 AM<BR>To: Moses, Darby;
veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<BR>Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu]
NT/WIN2K
FTP&Backup throughput<BR><BR><BR>You shouldn't expect that.
Different methods of file access and transfer have different
overheads. For example, download a large FTP file from an off-network
location using Internet Explorer and then download the same file using a
standard FTP client like WS_FTP. You'll usually see a marked
difference. Another comparison is to copy a very large file between
Windows machines using copy/paste from the GUI and then copy the same file
using a utility like robocopy. Windows file handling is notoriously
inefficient and
slow.<BR><BR>Matt<BR><BR>________________________________________<BR>From:
Moses, Darby [mailto:DMoses AT leviton DOT com] <BR>Sent: Monday, June 23,
2003
11:10 AM<BR>To: Veritas-BackUp support group<BR><BR>If I can transfer a
file
using FTP from my Veritas server to a client at 5000 KB/s should
I
get better than the 1200KB/s throughput I get from NetBackup for my backups
from that client?<BR> <BR> <BR>Regards,<BR>Darby
Moses<BR>Operations <BR>Leviton Mfg.<BR>Phone: (718) 281-6597 Fax: (718)
281-6999<BR>DMOSES AT LEVITON DOT COM WWW.LEVITON.COM
<BR> <BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Veritas-bu
maillist -
Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT
edu<BR>http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu<BR></FONT><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C339AB.F9C82460--
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Moses, Darby
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Quarantine
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Moses, Darby
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, David Chapa
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Quarantine
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Moses, Darby
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Donaldson, Mark
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Lowell Fafard
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Moses, Darby
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput,
Donaldson, Mark <=
- [Veritas-bu] NT/WIN2K FTP&Backup throughput, Moses, Darby
|
|
|