Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] NDMP Support

2003-06-20 15:17:58
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NDMP Support
From: jimh AT federaledge DOT com (Jimh)
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 12:17:58 -0700
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C33725.FFFE4F40
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Veritas supports Procom on a old Procom OS.  Call Procom and complain.
Veritas charges vendors for certification.  Procom hasn't kept up. 
4.5 does work but I'm having some issues  of
Veritas-NDMP->Procom->Overland Neo->LTO
Jim
Sorry if this is a repeat. (email problems)
-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Rick Essex
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 9:23 AM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NDMP Support

I have a question about NetBackup Business Server and NDMP. I can't seem
to get a straight answer as to if NetBackup (not Backup Exec) Business
Server will support a Procom 4100 (one of the largest NAS units on the
market). It does not seem to make sense that Veritas would support a
huge NAS with a $1,500 NDMP module, but even Veritas can't say yes or
no. I would think it would have to be NetBackup DataCenter, but like I
said, I can't seem to find anyone at Veritas that can answer this
question.
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Rick



------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C33725.FFFE4F40
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
6.0.4630.0">
<TITLE>RE: [Veritas-bu] NDMP Support</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/rtf format -->

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Tahoma">Veritas supports Procom on a old =
Procom OS.&nbsp; Call Procom and complain.</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Tahoma">Veritas charges vendors for =
certification.&nbsp; Procom hasn't kept up. </FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Tahoma">4.5 does work but I'm having some =
issues&nbsp; of Veritas-NDMP-&gt;Procom-&gt;Overland Neo-&gt;LTO</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Tahoma">Jim</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Tahoma">Sorry if this is a repeat. (email =
problems)</FONT>

<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Tahoma">-----Original Message-----<BR>
<B>From:</B> veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [</FONT><A =
HREF=3D"mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu"><U><FONT =
COLOR=3D"#0000FF" SIZE=3D2 =
FACE=3D"Tahoma">mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT 
edu</FONT></U>=
</A><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Tahoma">]</FONT><B> <FONT SIZE=3D2 =
FACE=3D"Tahoma">On Behalf Of</FONT></B> <FONT SIZE=3D2 =
FACE=3D"Tahoma">Rick Essex<BR>
</FONT><B><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Tahoma">Sent:</FONT></B><FONT SIZE=3D2 =
FACE=3D"Tahoma"> Friday, June 20, 2003 9:23 AM<BR>
</FONT><B><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Tahoma">To:</FONT></B><FONT SIZE=3D2 =
FACE=3D"Tahoma"> veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<BR>
</FONT><B><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Tahoma">Subject:</FONT></B><FONT =
SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Tahoma"> [Veritas-bu] NDMP Support<BR>
</FONT>

<BR><FONT FACE=3D"Times New Roman">I have a question about NetBackup =
Business Server and NDMP. I can't seem to get a straight answer as to if =
NetBackup (not Backup Exec) Business Server will support a Procom 4100 =
(one of the largest NAS units on the market). It does not seem to make =
sense that Veritas would support a huge NAS with a $1,500 NDMP module, =
but even Veritas can't say yes or no. I would think it would have to be =
NetBackup DataCenter, but like I said, I can't seem to find anyone at =
Veritas that can answer this question.</FONT></P>

<P><FONT FACE=3D"Times New Roman">Any help would be greatly =
appreciated!</FONT>

<BR><FONT FACE=3D"Times New Roman">Rick<BR>
</FONT>
</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C33725.FFFE4F40--


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>