|
[Veritas-bu] Veritas Netbackup posting: restore time rule of thumb confirmatio n from others...
2003-03-26 15:24:13
|
Subject: |
[Veritas-bu] Veritas Netbackup posting: restore time rule of thumb confirmatio n from others... |
|
From: |
mma AT co.ba.md DOT us (Mark Ma) |
|
Date: |
Wed, 26 Mar 2003 15:24:13 -0500 |
--=_4817F990.7716F063
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
How large is the NT server? How fast does it backup?
Did you backup the Windows swap file as well ? It could be a large file. =
Make sure exclude it.
-Mark=20
>>> "Siano, James C" <james.c.siano AT lmco DOT com> 03/25/03 06:04PM >>>
Hello.
I've got a partition on an NT server that is taking over 2.5 days to
restore. If a partition takes 20 hours to backup
should the rule of thumb of backup hours * 2 be taken into consideration?
I can go into all the glorious configuration details; but looking to =
verify
the rule from other's real world experiences.
I was always under the impression that the backup function is optimized =
more
so than the restoration process.
Thanks
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
--=_4817F990.7716F063
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" http-equiv=3DContent-Type=
>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.3103.1000" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style=3D"FONT: 8pt Tahoma; MARGIN-LEFT: 2px; MARGIN-TOP: 2px">
<DIV><FONT size=3D1>How large is the NT server? How fast does it=20
backup?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D1>Did</FONT><FONT size=3D1> you backup the Windows =
swap file=20
as well ? It could be a large file. Make sure exclude it.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>-Mark <BR><BR>>>> "Siano, James C"=20
<james.c.siano AT lmco DOT com> 03/25/03 06:04PM=20
>>><BR>Hello.<BR><BR>I've got a partition on an NT server that =
is=20
taking over 2.5 days to<BR>restore. If a partition takes 20 =
hours to=20
backup<BR>should the rule of thumb of backup hours * 2 be taken into=20
consideration?<BR><BR>I can go into all the glorious configuration =
details; but=20
looking to verify<BR>the rule from other's real world experiences.<BR><BR>I=
was=20
always under the impression that the backup function is optimized =
more<BR>so=20
than the restoration=20
process.<BR><BR>Thanks<BR>_______________________________________________<B=
R>Veritas-bu=20
maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<BR><A=20
href=3D"http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu";>http://m=
ailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu</A><BR></DIV></BODY></HTM=
L>
--=_4817F990.7716F063--
|
|
|
