This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------=_NextPartTM-000-f413fb13-54ab-11d7-b78d-0002a58abbf5
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C2E8BD.364EE618"
------_=_NextPart_001_01C2E8BD.364EE618
Content-Type: text/plain
You are absolutely correct, Mark. I forgot to mention that you do not have
to have vault to do this, as it can be scripted through CLI. However, for
non-scripting people, the vault option will allow the dupes from disk to
tape as well.
Also, another good point that Mark brings up -- you need quite a chunk of
disk space to do this (hopefully on a SAN).
Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: Donaldson, Mark [mailto:Mark.Donaldson AT experianems DOT com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 11:25 AM
To: Pearson, Gregory M (Getronics); 'stafforj AT core.afcc DOT com'; David A.
Chapa
Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Datacenter versus TSM
Backing-up to a disk storage unit then duplicating to tape is very possible
- it doesn't require the vault product, either. I've scripted it for my
frequent, small backups of Oracle archived redo logs.
I wouldn't recommend the method for large bulky backups, though, unless you
have vast tracts of unused disks for buffering.
-M
-----Original Message-----
From: Pearson, Gregory M (Getronics) [ mailto:Greg.Pearson AT bp DOT com
<mailto:Greg.Pearson AT bp DOT com> ]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 10:09 AM
To: 'stafforj AT core.afcc DOT com'; David A. Chapa
Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Datacenter versus TSM
Yeah, I am curious too, as I talked over some options with a couple of
engineers from Veritas, and we tossed around a few ideas. However, since we
are W2K, writing to a disk pool first is a challenge due to W2K desiring a
signature on the disk. Therefore, using a rotating disk pool for a storage
device is pretty much out of the question in the M$ world. however, I
believe with *NIX this is far more feasible. Back up to disk storage device
first, then dupe to tape using vaulting...of course work out the semantics
for breaking the disk off of one media server and attaching it to another...
Is this similar to your idea?
Just an FYI on the TSM also, I am pretty sure the database has been ported
to DB/2. There are some things that you can do to ensure the integrity of
the database, but it requires some effort. The concept of one full and
incrementals forever is still the recommended rotation that is used, just
keep in mind that a full system recovery may require a LOT of tapes...
Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: Johnie Stafford [ mailto:stafforj AT core.afcc DOT com
<mailto:stafforj AT core.afcc DOT com> ]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 10:49 AM
To: David A. Chapa
Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Datacenter versus TSM
>>> On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:19:28 -0600, "David A. Chapa"
<david AT datastaff DOT com> said:
dc> Having said that...there are some very cool things about TSM.
dc> The coolest thing is that is caches backup to disk before
dc> streaming to tape...or should I say SCREAM to tape. This is
dc> something that I would love to see VERITAS do, but I think I have
dc> an idea that will achieve the same thing without having VERITAS'
dc> code being changed.
Aw come on David, you can't leave us hanging like that! What's your
idea?
Johnie
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
<http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu>
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
<http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C2E8BD.364EE618
Content-Type: text/html
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<TITLE>RE: [Veritas-bu] Datacenter versus TSM</TITLE>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.3502.4373" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=876273117-12032003>You
are absolutely correct, Mark. I forgot to mention that you do not have to
have vault to do this, as it can be scripted through CLI. However, for
non-scripting people, the vault option will allow the dupes from disk to tape
as
well.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=876273117-12032003></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=876273117-12032003>Also,
another good point that Mark brings up -- you need quite a chunk of disk space
to do this (hopefully on a SAN).</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=876273117-12032003></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=876273117-12032003>Greg</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV align=left class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Donaldson, Mark
[mailto:Mark.Donaldson AT experianems DOT com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday,
March 12,
2003 11:25 AM<BR><B>To:</B> Pearson, Gregory M (Getronics);
'stafforj AT core.afcc DOT com'; David A. Chapa<BR><B>Cc:</B>
veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: [Veritas-bu]
Datacenter versus TSM<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<P><FONT size=2>Backing-up to a disk storage unit then duplicating to tape is
very possible - it doesn't require the vault product, either. I've
scripted it for my frequent, small backups of Oracle archived redo
logs.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2>I wouldn't recommend the method for large bulky backups,
though, unless you have vast tracts of unused disks for buffering.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2>-M</FONT> </P>
<P><FONT size=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>From:
Pearson, Gregory M (Getronics) [<A
href="mailto:Greg.Pearson AT bp DOT com">mailto:Greg.Pearson AT bp DOT
com</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT size=2>Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 10:09 AM</FONT> <BR><FONT
size=2>To: 'stafforj AT core.afcc DOT com'; David A. Chapa</FONT> <BR><FONT
size=2>Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu</FONT> <BR><FONT
size=2>Subject:
RE: [Veritas-bu] Datacenter versus TSM</FONT> </P><BR>
<P><FONT size=2>Yeah, I am curious too, as I talked over some options with a
couple of</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>engineers from Veritas, and we tossed
around
a few ideas. However, since we</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>are W2K, writing
to a disk pool first is a challenge due to W2K desiring a</FONT> <BR><FONT
size=2>signature on the disk. Therefore, using a rotating disk pool for
a storage</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>device is pretty much out of the question
in
the M$ world. however, I</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>believe with *NIX this
is far more feasible. Back up to disk storage device</FONT> <BR><FONT
size=2>first, then dupe to tape using vaulting...of course work out the
semantics</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>for breaking the disk off of one media
server and attaching it to another...</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>Is this similar
to your idea? </FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2>Just an FYI on the TSM also, I am pretty sure the database
has
been ported</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>to DB/2. There are some things that
you can do to ensure the integrity of</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>the database,
but it requires some effort. The concept of one full and</FONT>
<BR><FONT size=2>incrementals forever is still the recommended rotation that
is used, just</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>keep in mind that a full system
recovery
may require a LOT of tapes...</FONT> </P>
<P><FONT size=2>Greg</FONT> </P>
<P><FONT size=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>From:
Johnie Stafford [<A
href="mailto:stafforj AT core.afcc DOT com">mailto:stafforj AT core.afcc DOT
com</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT size=2>Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 10:49 AM</FONT> <BR><FONT
size=2>To: David A. Chapa</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>Cc:
veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>Subject: Re:
[Veritas-bu] Datacenter versus TSM</FONT> </P><BR>
<P><FONT size=2>>>> On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:19:28 -0600, "David A.
Chapa"</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2><david AT datastaff DOT com>
said:</FONT> </P>
<P><FONT size=2> dc> Having said that...there are some very cool
things about TSM.</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2> dc> The coolest thing is
that is caches backup to disk before</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2> dc>
streaming to tape...or should I say SCREAM to tape. This is</FONT>
<BR><FONT size=2> dc> something that I would love to see VERITAS do,
but I think I have</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2> dc> an idea that will
achieve the same thing without having VERITAS'</FONT> <BR><FONT
size=2> dc> code being changed.</FONT> </P>
<P><FONT size=2>Aw come on David, you can't leave us hanging like that!
What's
your</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>idea?</FONT> </P>
<P><FONT size=2>Johnie</FONT> </P>
<P><FONT size=2>_______________________________________________</FONT>
<BR><FONT size=2>Veritas-bu maillist -
Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2><A
href="http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu"
target=_blank>http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu</A></FONT>
<BR><FONT size=2>_______________________________________________</FONT>
<BR><FONT size=2>Veritas-bu maillist -
Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2><A
href="http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu"
target=_blank>http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu</A></FONT>
</P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C2E8BD.364EE618--
------=_NextPartTM-000-f413fb13-54ab-11d7-b78d-0002a58abbf5--
|