Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] SDLT vs LTO Ultrium

2002-12-10 14:43:33
Subject: [Veritas-bu] SDLT vs LTO Ultrium
From: jason.cordes AT letigre DOT com (jason.cordes AT letigre DOT com)
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:43:33 -0600
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C2A084.6C46C620
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"

The majority of installs I do are using SDLT and SDLT libraries. Before v45
of the firmware came out I was ready to give up on SDLT completely because I
was having nothing but problems with them. I was lucky to have Netbackup get
through a single backup with any drives still up. 
 
But since v45 has come out, I have yet to see a single problem with SDLT.
Every install I have done has gone off without a hitch and I've gotten all
my past installs to upgrade their drives to v45 and since that they have had
no issues as well. Now that they've finally gotten these drive stable and
functional I am a big proponent of SDLT.
 
Jason Cordes
LeTigre Computing

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Jacobson [mailto:SJACOBSO AT novell DOT com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 1:25 PM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu; jkennedy AT qualcomm DOT com;
rob AT worman DOT org; dritschel62 AT yahoo DOT com
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] SDLT vs LTO Ultrium


Yes please tell more, we are about to evaluate the M2500 with SDLT 320's -
anyone seen any problems?
 
Thanks,
Scott J.


>>> "Kennedy, Jeffrey" <jkennedy AT qualcomm DOT com> 12/10/02 11:32AM >>>
I would be very interested to hear what problems you're referring to.  I
was using SDLT 220 models and had no issues with at all.  Minus the
occasional NBU problem of course.

In my current position the operations group just bought 20 SDLT 320's
(or is it 330's?) and they love them.  There are 45 more on order.  So
far they've had no problems.

Can you give specifics?  I'm sure I'm not the only one interested.

~JK

-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Worman [ mailto:rob AT worman DOT org] <mailto:rob AT worman DOT 
org]>  
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 9:12 AM
To: Douglas Ritschel; veritas-ng
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] SDLT vs LTO Ultrium

doug you didn't hear it from me, but if you're at a decision point 
right now, choose LTO's.

there have been, and continue to be, really really unpleasant 
problems with even the latest versions of the SDLT firmware from 
quantum.

for that reason alone, LTO's are the winner of SDLT in my opinion. 
feel free to share this with the list, but leave my name out of it 
please.

HTH
rob


At 7:30 AM -0800 12/10/02, Douglas Ritschel wrote:
>What are the advantages and disadvantages of getting
>LTO Ultrium drives rather than SDLT drives?
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> http://mailplus.yahoo.com <http://mailplus.yahoo.com/> 
>_______________________________________________
>Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
<http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu> 

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
<http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu> 

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
<http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu> 



------_=_NextPart_001_01C2A084.6C46C620
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">


<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2716.2200" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style="MARGIN-TOP: 2px; FONT: 8pt MS Sans Serif; MARGIN-LEFT: 2px">
<DIV><SPAN class=400164619-10122002><FONT size=1>The majority of installs I do 
are using SDLT and SDLT libraries. Before v45 of the firmware came out I was 
ready to give up on SDLT completely because I was having nothing but problems 
with them. I was lucky to have Netbackup get through a single backup with any 
drives still up. </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=400164619-10122002><FONT size=1></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=400164619-10122002><FONT size=1>But since v45 has come out, I 
have yet to see a single problem with SDLT. Every install I have done has gone 
off without a hitch and I've gotten all my past installs to upgrade their 
drives 
to v45 and since that they have had no issues as well. Now that they've finally 
gotten these drive stable and functional I am a big proponent of 
SDLT.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=400164619-10122002><FONT size=1></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=400164619-10122002><FONT size=1>Jason 
Cordes</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=400164619-10122002><FONT size=1>LeTigre 
Computing</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma 
  size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Scott Jacobson 
  [mailto:SJACOBSO AT novell DOT com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, December 10, 
2002 1:25 
  PM<BR><B>To:</B> veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu; jkennedy AT 
qualcomm DOT com; 
  rob AT worman DOT org; dritschel62 AT yahoo DOT com<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: 
[Veritas-bu] SDLT 
  vs LTO Ultrium<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=2>Yes please tell more, we are about to evaluate the M2500 
  with SDLT 320's - anyone seen any problems?</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=2>Thanks,</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT size=2>Scott J.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><BR><BR>&gt;&gt;&gt; "Kennedy, Jeffrey" &lt;jkennedy AT qualcomm DOT 
com&gt; 
  12/10/02 11:32AM &gt;&gt;&gt;<BR>I would be very interested to hear what 
  problems you're referring to.&nbsp; I<BR>was using SDLT 220 models and had no 
  issues with at all.&nbsp; Minus the<BR>occasional NBU problem of 
  course.<BR><BR>In my current position the operations group just bought 20 
SDLT 
  320's<BR>(or is it 330's?) and they love them.&nbsp; There are 45 more on 
  order.&nbsp; So<BR>far they've had no problems.<BR><BR>Can you give 
  specifics?&nbsp; I'm sure I'm not the only one 
  interested.<BR><BR>~JK<BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From: Rob Worman 
  [<A href="mailto:rob AT worman DOT org]">mailto:rob AT worman DOT org]</A> 
<BR>Sent: 
  Tuesday, December 10, 2002 9:12 AM<BR>To: Douglas Ritschel; 
  veritas-ng<BR>Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] SDLT vs LTO Ultrium<BR><BR>doug you 
  didn't hear it from me, but if you're at a decision point <BR>right now, 
  choose LTO's.<BR><BR>there have been, and continue to be, really really 
  unpleasant <BR>problems with even the latest versions of the SDLT firmware 
  from <BR>quantum.<BR><BR>for that reason alone, LTO's are the winner of SDLT 
  in my opinion. <BR>feel free to share this with the list, but leave my name 
  out of it <BR>please.<BR><BR>HTH<BR>rob<BR><BR><BR>At 7:30 AM -0800 12/10/02, 
  Douglas Ritschel wrote:<BR>&gt;What are the advantages and disadvantages of 
  getting<BR>&gt;LTO Ultrium drives rather than SDLT 
  
drives?<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;__________________________________________________<BR>&gt;Do
 
  you Yahoo!?<BR>&gt;Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up 
  now.<BR>&gt;<A 
  
href="http://mailplus.yahoo.com/";>http://mailplus.yahoo.com</A><BR>&gt;_______________________________________________<BR>&gt;Veritas-bu
 
  maillist&nbsp; -&nbsp; Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<BR>&gt;<A 
  
href="http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu";>http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu</A><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Veritas-bu
 
  maillist&nbsp; -&nbsp; Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<BR><A 
  
href="http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu";>http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu</A><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Veritas-bu
 
  maillist&nbsp; -&nbsp; Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<BR><A 
  
href="http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu";>http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu</A><BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C2A084.6C46C620--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>