We have been thinking about this, but we will dup the backups after they 
are taken.

What you will need on the remote location depends a lot on what you already 
have.

If the remote library/tapedrives are on your SAN you could use your normal 
media servers.

/johnny

At 10:32 04-10-2002 -0400, Bob Grabbe wrote:
>Tried it once, but had to stop because it put all my other backup
>schedules behind.
>On one policy, backing up 15 netware servers, I set the policy to make
>2 copies with one for off-site. The 2nd copy worked, didn't slow
>throughput as far as I could tell, but instead of taking up one drive
>for each image, takes up two and policies that were set to start later
>than this one were delayed. If you can work out the scheduling, it
>seemed to work well.
>
>
>Robert Grabbe
>Dominos Pizza LLC
>734-930-3703
>grabbeb AT dominos DOT com
>
> >>> <Brian_Drager AT vanguard DOT com> 10/4/02 10:17:03 AM >>>
>Is anyone doing inline tape copy to a remote location for second copy.
>We will
>be evaluating soon. I'm guessing that the server in the remote location
>has to
>be a media server with it's robot & tape drives and be part of the
>master
>server. Same domain. How is the performance. Will it slow up your
>original copy
>if the second copy is going at a slower speed?
>
>Thanks
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
>_______________________________________________
>Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu