Has anyone determined what the practical time differences are in a
restore from a multiplexed backup vs a non-multiplexed?  I would be
interested in both single file restore as well as full filesystem from
each.

I ask because up till now my DR backups (offsite) have all been
non-multiplexed.  But given the increase in data size and the backup
window not changing I need to do something to speed up the process.  But
I don't want to speed it up at the cost of recovery.  If restoring from
a multiplexed backup is, say, 10% slower this would be acceptable.  But
if it's 100% slower then that would not be.  Anything in between is TBD
whether it's acceptable or not.

Thanks for any input.
-- 
=====================
Jeff Kennedy
Unix Administrator
AMCC
jlkennedy AT amcc DOT com