Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Multiple Streams 101

2002-02-22 17:12:47
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Multiple Streams 101
From: cgbrewer AT RMBSC DOT COM (Chris Brewer)
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 15:12:47 -0700
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C1BBEE.0F0EC000
Content-Type: text/plain

It sounds like allowing multiple data streams on any box with multiple file
systems on the same physical drive device is a bad idea...correct?

Say I have a Sun server w/ the following mount points and slices:

   /             c0t0d0s0
   /usr          c0t0d0s1
   /export/home  c0t0d0s3
   /data         c0t1d0s0

Using the ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES file list directive and multiple streams will
reduce my performance since four jobs will be created, three of which are on
the same physical drive (and potentially could be active at the same time)?
A better solution would be:

   NEW_STREAM
   /
   /usr
   /export/home
   NEW_STREAM
   /data

Correct?

Thanks for your patience. I'll get it shortly!

------_=_NextPart_001_01C1BBEE.0F0EC000
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2653.12">
<TITLE>Multiple Streams 101</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">It sounds like allowing multiple =
data streams on any box with multiple file systems on the same physical =
drive device is a bad idea...correct?</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">Say I have a Sun server w/ the =
following mount points and slices:</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">&nbsp;&nbsp; =
/&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp=
; c0t0d0s0</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">&nbsp;&nbsp; =
/usr&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; =
c0t0d0s1</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">&nbsp;&nbsp; /export/home&nbsp; =
c0t0d0s3</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">&nbsp;&nbsp; =
/data&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; c0t1d0s0</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">Using the ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES file =
list directive and multiple streams will reduce my performance since =
four jobs will be created, three of which are on the same physical =
drive (and potentially could be active at the same time)? A better =
solution would be:</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">&nbsp;&nbsp; NEW_STREAM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">&nbsp;&nbsp; /</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">&nbsp;&nbsp; /usr</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">&nbsp;&nbsp; =
/export/home</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">&nbsp;&nbsp; NEW_STREAM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">&nbsp;&nbsp; /data</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">Correct?</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">Thanks for your patience. I'll =
get it shortly!</FONT>
</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C1BBEE.0F0EC000--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>