|
[Veritas-bu] OTM
2001-10-25 11:26:16
This is a MIME message. If you are reading this text, you may want to
consider changing to a mail reader or gateway that understands how to
properly handle MIME multipart messages.
--=_91CB7F35.C8A9D457
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Charles,
=20
In my opinion the OTM feature/option now in NB 3.4.1 has way fallen short =
of "marketed" expectations. Whether or not it's Columbia Data Products =
issue or Veritas, I can't say. I also (when I use it) spend much time in =
tweaking it for both NetWare and NT in keeping the same performance =
compared to when it is disabled. I've not yet seen one occurance on =
either platforms of a "Perfect Backup" (Status 0) while using OTM.
=20
Scott J.
>>> Charles R Somogyi <charles.somogyi AT bms DOT com> 10/24/01 04:53PM >>>
Hello:
What is the general feel for OTM on NB NT clients? I have to
tweak the thing like crazy and I still get a ton of 1's due to
skipped files. Anybody else going through the same thing? And
these skipped files are required to be backed up (ie system32
directory, etc, etc). Are updates to the OTM product found in the
Veritas patches?
(HP-UX 11.0 Master, NT Clients, NB DataCenter 3.4)
Charlie Somogyi
BMS
609-818-3589
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu=20
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu=20
--=_91CB7F35.C8A9D457
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1"=
>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4807.2300" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 2px; FONT: 8pt MS Sans Serif; MARGIN-LEFT: =
2px">
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Charles,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>In my opinion the OTM feature/option now in NB 3.4.1 =
has way=20
fallen short of "marketed" expectations. Whether or not =
it's=20
Columbia Data Products issue or Veritas, I can't say. I also (when I =
use=20
it) spend much time in tweaking it for both NetWare and NT in keeping =
the=20
same performance compared to when it is disabled. I've not yet seen =
one=20
occurance on either platforms of a "Perfect Backup" (Status 0) while =
using=20
OTM.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Scott J.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><BR><BR>>>> Charles R Somogyi <charles.somogyi AT bms DOT
com>=
=20
10/24/01 04:53PM >>><BR>Hello:<BR><BR>What is the general feel =
for OTM=20
on NB NT clients? I have to<BR>tweak the thing like crazy and I still get =
a ton=20
of 1's due to<BR>skipped files. Anybody else going through the same =
thing?=20
And<BR>these skipped files are required to be backed up (ie=20
system32<BR>directory, etc, etc). Are updates to the OTM product found =
in=20
the<BR>Veritas patches?<BR><BR>(HP-UX 11.0 Master, NT Clients, NB =
DataCenter=20
3.4)<BR><BR>Charlie=20
Somogyi<BR>BMS<BR>609-818-3589<BR><BR>_____________________________________=
__________<BR>Veritas-bu=20
maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu<BR><A=20
href=3D"http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu";>http://m=
ailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu</A><BR></DIV></BODY></HTM=
L>
--=_91CB7F35.C8A9D457--
|
|
|
