Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Blcllist quesiton

2001-10-11 15:33:24
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Blcllist quesiton
From: Bob Bakh" <bob.bakh AT home DOT com (Bob Bakh)
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 12:33:24 -0700
also a - help sometimes get you at least usage.

Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Fabbro, Andrew P" <Fabbro.Andrew AT cnf DOT com>
To: "Veritas BU" <veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu>
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 11:39 AM
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Blcllist quesiton


> Man pages?  For Netbackup command line?  Ha ha ha ha ha ha.
>
> I don't think bpcllist will help you, but something like
>
> bpclinfo SOME_CLASS_NAME -L
>
> or -U might be what you're looking for.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vapiwala, Kevin V [IT] [mailto:kevin.v.vapiwala AT ssmb DOT com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 11:10 AM
> To: Veritas BU
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] Blcllist quesiton
>
>
> Is there a way to be bpcllist rto exclude inactive classes? Or is there
any
> info on from bpcllist that will tell me if a class is inactive?
> Can someone email me the manpage on it? It's not in the manual.
>
> Kevin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vapiwala, Kevin V [IT]
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:39 PM
> To: 'Gregg Yurchak'; 'Jason Ahrens'; Veritas BU
> Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Restore priority
>
>
> Gotcha! I guess I sort of misread your original reply. You're right, my
> suggesiton would work only if you're not using SSO.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gregg Yurchak [mailto:gyurchak AT veritas DOT com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:30 PM
> To: Vapiwala, Kevin V [IT]; 'Jason Ahrens'; Veritas BU
> Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Restore priority
>
>
> What I'm implying is if you do have SSO and all media servers see all the
> drives, this isn't going to work (leaving one drive out of the storage
> unit).  You've got serverA, serverB, serverC, each with it's own storage
> unit, stuA, stuB, and stuC respectively.  You've got a total of 10 drives,
> seen by all three machines.  So you try and leave a drive out of each
> storage unit, and define each with 9 instead of 10.
>
> Backups start.  serverA uses 9 drives, because that's all it can.  serverB
> comes along and says hey, I can use up to 9 drives, and here's one free,
so
> I'll use it.  This is true however you work it.  The only way to get it to
> work would be to put just three drives in each storage unit, which would
> always leave one free.  This quickly becomes rather obscene as media
servers
> increase.
>
> Even if stuB and stuC have 1 drive each in their storage unit(say they're
> SAN Media Servers only backing themselves up), stuA can't have more than 7
> drives.
>
> Getting tricky still doesn't work.  People have tried to define all 10
> drives on serverA, and only put 9 in it's storage unit.  Then they only
let
> serverB and serverC see one drive each (again, to use a drastic example).
> The problem here is you've got good odds, but if the first 9 drives
serverA
> uses doesn't include the two physical ones defined on serverB or serverC,
as
> soon as they start a backup you lose the reserved drive.  Additionally, if
> serverB or serverC start a backup before serverA starts all his, you lose
> the reserved drive.
>
> Thanks,
> Gregg Yurchak
> VERITAS Consultant
> Biloxi, MS
> gregg AT veritas DOT com
> Office: 1.228.822.9810
> Cell:    1.228.324.6939
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vapiwala, Kevin V [IT] [mailto:kevin.v.vapiwala AT ssmb DOT com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 9:17 AM
> To: 'Gregg Yurchak'; 'Jason Ahrens'; Veritas BU
> Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Restore priority
>
>
> I don't think you need SSO to set the storage unit to have a free tape
drive
> for restores. We;ve implemented that on all of our 9710s and we run 9
drives
> for backups and have a free one for restores.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gregg Yurchak [mailto:gyurchak AT veritas DOT com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 11:38 AM
> To: Vapiwala, Kevin V [IT]; 'Jason Ahrens'; Veritas BU
> Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Restore priority
>
>
> This only works if you're not using SSO, which many people are know.  Or
if
> you are sharing drives, you have to really seriously limit the amount seen
> by each server.
>
> Thanks,
> Gregg Yurchak
> VERITAS Consultant
> Biloxi, MS
> gregg AT veritas DOT com
> Office: 1.228.822.9810
> Cell:    1.228.324.6939
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vapiwala, Kevin V [IT] [mailto:kevin.v.vapiwala AT ssmb DOT com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 7:30 AM
> To: 'Jason Ahrens'; Veritas BU
> Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Restore priority
>
>
> Why not just set your Storage Unit Properties to one less drive then you
> have on your Storage Unit, that way you have a driver free at all times
for
> a restore.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Ahrens [mailto:AhrensJ AT psi DOT ca]
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 9:40 AM
> To: Veritas BU
> Subject: [Veritas-bu] Restore priority
>
>
> Yesterday night, we had a system go down. The system was rebuilt and a
> restore was started to bring back the data.
>
> The restore was started just minutes after the backup window opened. This
> means taht the queue was full of backup jobs. It also appeared that the
> restore did not take priority over the backups, and it would have taken
> hours to wait for the queue to clear. This was not acceptable and we ended
> up killing all the backup jobs so the restore could happen, and requeued
all
> the backups.
>
> I'm thinking there has to be a better way.
>
> How can I instruct NetBackup to consider restores at a higher priority
than
> backups, so that when the first free drive and required tape becomes free,
> the restore will occur. I would't ask that backups in progress are
> halted/suspended for the restore, just that the restore go to the top of
the
> queue.
>
> Thanks
>
> Jason
>
> --
> Jason Ahrens
> Systems Administrator/Backup Specialist
> PSINet Limited
> http://www.psi.ca
> The Internet SuperCarrier
>
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
> _______________________________________________
> Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>