Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Planning Netbackup in a VCS Cluster

2001-10-11 12:42:17
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Planning Netbackup in a VCS Cluster
From: axel-kunze AT web DOT de (Axel Kunze)
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 18:42:17 +0200
Sad, sad ... so I can't configure any automatic redundancy except configuring
all drives in NB and down the drives second path ...


Thanks for your thoughts ..

Regards

Axel Kunze 

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 11.10.2001 at 10:38 Xu Chen wrote:

>You don't need SSO option (if it's a passive-active cluster).
>
>NBU will see two paths to drive, and only one will be used when doing drive
>configuration.
>
>That's my 0.2$ thoughts.
>
>Xu Chen
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>[mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu]On Behalf Of Axel Kunze
>Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 10:01 AM
>To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>Subject: [Veritas-bu] Planning Netbackup in a VCS Cluster
>
>
>Hi dear list members !
>
>I'm about to plan, what I need for a Netbackup Server clustered with VCS
>1.3.
>First of all we'll be using STK 9840 because of their FCAL ability. STK
>says
>they're
>dualported, so I assume I can have two paths to a single drive connected to
>each
>cluster node via a san.
>How does Netbackup handle the two paths to a single drive ? Do I need the
>SSO option
>to handle this ?
>
>Any help ?
>
>Regards
>
>Axel Kunzet
>
>_______________________________________________
>Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

.