Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Upgrading from 3.2 -> 3.4

2001-03-30 10:25:33
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Upgrading from 3.2 -> 3.4
From: llabonte AT att DOT com (Labonte, L R (Leo), SITS)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 10:25:33 -0500
You also need a license key for tape drives in a tape library.

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Dvorak [mailto:sdvorak AT veritas DOT com]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 6:42 PM
To: 'James Laurie'; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Upgrading from 3.2 -> 3.4 


James,
It means, in order to do the upgrade it will ask you for the 'base license
key' for the Master Server.  Once the upgrade of the Master is done, you
will need to install the other keys for clients, database agents, etc. in
order to successfully accomplish backups.  You should have a license key
that enables all your clients (or maybe several).  i.e. if you have a 100
clients, you could have a single key that activates 100 clients.
Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: James Laurie [mailto:jlaurie AT csu DOT org]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 3:56 PM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Upgrading from 3.2 -> 3.4 


Does this mean I don't need to have RTU licenses for each client?

Quoting "David A. Chapa"

You do need your license keys, yes.  It will ask for 
them when you do the upgrade (server only).

Quoting "Collins, Kathy" <KCollins AT coral-energy DOT com>:

> Doesn't the licensing work differently in 3.4?
> Do I need to make sure my licenses are all in order
> for my server and many many clients before upgrading?
> Did you guys upgrade just your server, or clients as 
well?
>
> Thanks
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>