Well, all it takes is a simple test. Do a few restores during a lengthy
tape duplicate session, and start a bpvault during a lengthy bpdbbackup.
I've done both about a year ago :-)
> From david AT datastaff DOT com Wed Mar 28 12:40:10 2001
>
> Well, I'm not going to argue with you since I've been
> away from OpenVision for some years now, perhaps one of
> the Veritas guys can give us the inside scoop on how
> this works.
>
> Like I said, this is from my experience both using the
> product and as an OpenVision consultant.
>
>
> Quoting Michael Wei <wei AT colltech DOT com>:
>
> >
> > No so. Netbackup duplication doesn't even sit in any
> queue with backup or
> > restore, nor does it have any priority over or under
> any backup or restore
> > job. It'll keep running even you're backing up your
> database. Unless,
> > it's waiting for a tape that's being written or read
> by a backup or restore
> > job.
> >
> >
> > > From veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu Wed
> Mar 28 09:41:10 2001
> > > List-Archive:
> <http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/>
> > > Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 07:34:49 -0800 (PST)
> > >
> > > In my experience, bpduplicate has a lower priority
> than
> > > restore requests which have a lower priority than
> > > backup requests.
> > >
> > > while it didn't really 'pause', once it completed
> the
> > > duplication stream, it fell back in the priority
> queue
> > > behind restore before the next duplication stream
> > > kicked off.
> > >
> > > At least this has been my experience.
> > >
> > > David
> > > <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
> > > David A. Chapa
> > > Consulting Manager
> > > DataStaff, Inc.
> > > 847 413 1144
> > > http://www.consulting.datastaff.com
> > > ---------------------------------------
> > > NBU-LSERV AT datastaff DOT com - Adv. Scripting
> > >
> > >
> > > Quoting David Turner <Dturner AT manh DOT com>:
> > >
> > > > Yesterday I had to restore a mailbox however the
> > > duplicates were running.
> > > > Because this was a urgent restore I selected the
> > > appropriate files & qeued
> > > > the restore job. After the restore, started I
> realize
> > > the duplicates were
> > > > still running. I am not sure but, I think the
> system
> > > gave priority to the
> > > > restore job, pausing the duplicates, & then
> resuming
> > > the duplicates after
> > > > the restore was done. Does this sound logical as
> I am
> > > very new to the
> > > > netbackup scene. Can someone shed some light on
> this
> > > issue? I am running
> > > > ver
> > > > 3.4 on Exchange 5.5 on NT SP6.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thx
> > > > David
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-
> > > bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> > > >
> > >
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-
> > > bu
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-
> bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
> > >
> http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-
> bu
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mike Wei Collective Technologies, a Pencom
> Company
> > Email: wei AT colltech DOT com
> >
>
--
Mike Wei Collective Technologies, a Pencom Company
Email: wei AT colltech DOT com
|
