Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup DB Catalog File Paths

2001-03-15 12:34:00
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup DB Catalog File Paths
From: Bob Bakh bbakh AT veritas DOT com
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 09:34:00 -0800
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C0AD76.1F4781A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"

NAS is just Network Attached storage, and unless your doing SCSI over IP,
your doing NFS.  And in either case, all network issues are in place.  I'm
not a big fan of NFS or NAS in any mission critical application, like ERP,
Databases or in a fail over system, and especially for managing NBU
catalogs.  Disk is cheap, and if you use VERITAS Volume Manager and File
System you can grow volumes and file systems on the fly.
 
NAS is great for file services and sharing information that many people need
direct access to, which is not the case in any of the applications I
mentioned above.
 
NAS and NFS is subject to network problems, and direct attached SCSI is much
more stable.
 
This is my opinion and not to be mistaken with a VERITAS point of view, 
 
Thanks,
 
Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: Price, Michael [mailto:MPrice AT dantis DOT com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 11:32 AM
To: 'Dennis Dwyer'; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu; rajeev AT tigr 
DOT org
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup DB Catalog File Paths




        It works fine, but NFS is not a technology that offers "guaranteed
uptime."  That is not really in Veritas's hands, and they're not urging
anyone to use NFS for this.

        My question is whether NAS is stable enough---whether NAS offers an
additional stablility to NFS that gives enough of a guarantee to use for the
NBU databases.

-----Original Message----- 
From: Dennis Dwyer [ mailto:dfdwyer AT tecoenergy DOT com
<mailto:dfdwyer AT tecoenergy DOT com> ] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 1:25 PM 
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu; rajeev AT tigr DOT org 
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup DB Catalog File Paths 


I'm not using a NFS but I have mounted my NBU catalogs and files as a local
file system and have successfully grown it using Veritas Volume Manager
without any problem. I think, conceptually, you should be able to do it.
After all, isn't that the underlying basis for NAS and SAN? I would find it
peculiar that Veritas didn't support it with their own products. But hey ...
I've been misguided lots of times in my life.

Regards, 
Dennis 


Quote: "Time is not a test of the truth" 
Translation: Just because you've always done it that way, doesn't make it
right 

Dennis F. Dwyer 
Enterprise Storage Manager 
Tampa Electric Company 

(813) 225-5181  - Voice 
(813) 275-3599  - FAX 

Visit our corporate website at www.tecoenergy.com 

>>> "Karamchedu, Rajeev K." <rajeev AT tigr DOT org> 03/13/01 02:01PM >>> 
Hello 


Have you had any experiences with storing NB Catalogs 
on an NFS Filesystems ? I am trying to find out if they 
are problematic. Our netbackup catalog size is ever 
increasing due to our increasing backup tasks 
and I am thinking of throwing a part of it on a Netapp 
filer so that I can grow it on demand.. 

(or I could add an internal disk, but that's only migrating 
the problem to a future time...) 

I appreciate your inputs. 

Thanks 

Rajeev 
_______________________________________________ 
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu 
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
<http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu>  

_______________________________________________ 
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu 
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
<http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu>  


------_=_NextPart_001_01C0AD76.1F4781A0
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<TITLE>RE: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup DB Catalog File Paths</TITLE>

<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4207.2601" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=356502617-15032001><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>NAS 
is 
just Network Attached storage, and unless your doing SCSI over IP, your doing 
NFS.&nbsp; And in either case, all network issues are in place.&nbsp; I'm not a 
big fan of NFS or NAS in any mission critical application, like ERP, Databases 
or in a fail over system, and especially for managing NBU catalogs.&nbsp; Disk 
is cheap, and if you use VERITAS Volume Manager and File System you can grow 
volumes and file systems on the fly.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=356502617-15032001><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=356502617-15032001><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>NAS 
is 
great for file services and sharing information that many people need direct 
access to, which is not the case in any of the applications I mentioned 
above.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=356502617-15032001><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=356502617-15032001><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>NAS 
and NFS is subject to network problems, and direct attached SCSI is much more 
stable.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=356502617-15032001><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=356502617-15032001><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>This 
is my opinion and not to be mistaken with a VERITAS point of view, 
</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=356502617-15032001><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=356502617-15032001><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2>Thanks,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=356502617-15032001><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=356502617-15032001><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2>Bob</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma 
  size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Price, Michael 
  [mailto:MPrice AT dantis DOT com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, March 13, 2001 
11:32 
  AM<BR><B>To:</B> 'Dennis Dwyer'; veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu; 
  rajeev AT tigr DOT org<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup DB 
Catalog File 
  Paths<BR><BR></FONT></DIV><BR>
  <P>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <FONT size=2>It works fine, but 
  NFS is not a technology that offers "guaranteed uptime."&nbsp; That is not 
  really in Veritas's hands, and they're not urging anyone to use NFS for 
  this.</FONT></P>
  <P>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <FONT size=2>My question is 
  whether NAS is stable enough---whether NAS offers an additional stablility to 
  NFS that gives enough of a guarantee to use for the NBU databases.</FONT></P>
  <P><FONT size=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>From: 
  Dennis Dwyer [<A 
  href="mailto:dfdwyer AT tecoenergy DOT com">mailto:dfdwyer AT tecoenergy DOT 
com</A>]</FONT> 
  <BR><FONT size=2>Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 1:25 PM</FONT> <BR><FONT 
  size=2>To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu; rajeev AT tigr DOT 
org</FONT> <BR><FONT 
  size=2>Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup DB Catalog File Paths</FONT> 
  </P><BR>
  <P><FONT size=2>I'm not using a NFS but I have mounted my NBU catalogs and 
  files as a local file system and have successfully grown it using Veritas 
  Volume Manager without any problem. I think, conceptually, you should be able 
  to do it. After all, isn't that the underlying basis for NAS and SAN? I would 
  find it peculiar that Veritas didn't support it with their own products. But 
  hey ... I've been misguided lots of times in my life.</FONT></P>
  <P><FONT size=2>Regards,</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>Dennis</FONT> </P><BR>
  <P><FONT size=2>Quote: "Time is not a test of the truth"</FONT> <BR><FONT 
  size=2>Translation: Just because you've always done it that way, doesn't make 
  it right</FONT> </P>
  <P><FONT size=2>Dennis F. Dwyer</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>Enterprise Storage 
  Manager</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>Tampa Electric Company</FONT> </P>
  <P><FONT size=2>(813) 225-5181&nbsp; - Voice</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>(813) 
  275-3599&nbsp; - FAX</FONT> </P>
  <P><FONT size=2>Visit our corporate website at www.tecoenergy.com</FONT> </P>
  <P><FONT size=2>&gt;&gt;&gt; "Karamchedu, Rajeev K." &lt;rajeev AT tigr DOT 
org&gt; 
  03/13/01 02:01PM &gt;&gt;&gt;</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>Hello</FONT> </P><BR>
  <P><FONT size=2>Have you had any experiences with storing NB Catalogs</FONT> 
  <BR><FONT size=2>on an NFS Filesystems ? I am trying to find out if 
  they</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>are problematic. Our netbackup catalog size is 
  ever</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>increasing due to our increasing backup 
  tasks</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>and I am thinking of throwing a part of it on a 
  Netapp</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>filer so that I can grow it on demand..</FONT> 
  </P>
  <P><FONT size=2>(or I could add an internal disk, but that's only 
  migrating</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>the problem to a future time...)</FONT> </P>
  <P><FONT size=2>I appreciate your inputs.</FONT> </P>
  <P><FONT size=2>Thanks</FONT> </P>
  <P><FONT size=2>Rajeev</FONT> <BR><FONT 
  size=2>_______________________________________________</FONT> <BR><FONT 
  size=2>Veritas-bu maillist&nbsp; -&nbsp; Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT 
edu 
  </FONT><BR><FONT size=2><A target=_blank 
  
href="http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu";>http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu</A></FONT>
 
  </P>
  <P><FONT size=2>_______________________________________________</FONT> 
  <BR><FONT size=2>Veritas-bu maillist&nbsp; -&nbsp; 
  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2><A 
target=_blank 
  
href="http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu";>http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu</A></FONT>
 
  </P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C0AD76.1F4781A0--



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>