Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Re : bpbackupdb specific tape

2001-03-15 10:27:26
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Re : bpbackupdb specific tape
From: Price, Michael MPrice AT dantis DOT com
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 09:27:26 -0600
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C0AD64.C845350C
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"


        Isn't the only objection to putting a db backup on a normal backup
tape that the backup won't contain the info about that very backup job?
Otherwise, what difference does it make?

-----Original Message-----
From: adriaan.mosseveld AT bt DOT com [mailto:adriaan.mosseveld AT bt DOT com]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 2:35 AM
To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Re : bpbackupdb specific tape


The bpbackupdb command is not hardcoded to expect tapes from the netbackup
pool - we use a separate pool (netbackupdb) for database backups from our
offsiting routines to prevent any possible problems with routine db backups.
I would confirm as Rob Worman did that you should, under no circumstances,
try to put a db backup onto a normal backup tape (trashed data methinks).


Adriaan Mosseveld

_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

------_=_NextPart_001_01C0AD64.C845350C
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2650.12">
<TITLE>RE: [Veritas-bu] Re : bpbackupdb specific tape</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<BR>

<P>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <FONT SIZE=3D2>Isn't the =
only objection to putting a db backup on a normal backup tape that the =
backup won't contain the info about that very backup job?&nbsp; =
Otherwise, what difference does it make?</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>From: adriaan.mosseveld AT bt DOT com [<A =
HREF=3D"mailto:adriaan.mosseveld AT bt DOT com">mailto:adriaan.mosseveld AT bt 
DOT com=
</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 2:35 AM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Subject: [Veritas-bu] Re : bpbackupdb specific =
tape</FONT>
</P>
<BR>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>The bpbackupdb command is not hardcoded to expect =
tapes from the netbackup</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>pool - we use a separate pool (netbackupdb) for =
database backups from our</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>offsiting routines to prevent any possible problems =
with routine db backups.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>I would confirm as Rob Worman did that you should, =
under no circumstances,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>try to put a db backup onto a normal backup tape =
(trashed data methinks).</FONT>
</P>
<BR>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Adriaan Mosseveld</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT =
SIZE=3D2>_______________________________________________</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Veritas-bu maillist&nbsp; -&nbsp; =
Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2><A =
HREF=3D"http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu"; =
TARGET=3D"_blank">http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas=
-bu</A></FONT>
</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C0AD64.C845350C--



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>